As a boy on Long Island, I eagerly anticipated St Patrick’s Day—it was the harbinger of spring—but besides the religious holiday, it was the age-old, traditional Long Island “opening day“ of the winter flounder fishing season. So each year on or near that date I would drag my 10 foot, cedar frame, canvas hull canoe from the barn loft and with a pail of clam bait and several coils of twisted linen (Cuttyhunk) hand lines rigged with lead weights and Chestertown #9 flounder hooks, I would head to Great South Bay near Smith Point to fish for winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes Americanus) . There, among the waving reeds and smell of salt water I would splash though the clear shallows and paddle out to the edge of the channel where I would drop my anchor ( half of a concrete-block) and tie it off over the bow. With four # 9 Chestertown hooks baited with small chunks of fresh quahog i dropped the lines over the bulwark of the canoe and I tied off two lines to my bare toes and two I held in hand. In a short time, I that long anticipated little tug on the line, that mystery of what is at my bait. My lines were busy and one after another I would land a flapping flatfish with a brown back and white belly with the both eyes on the right side of its head, and a tiny mouth—at that point stuffed with the red-threaded stem of a Chestertown hook. In a short time I caught a dozen fat fooot long winter flounder. That would be taken home for a special dinner.
Last year, I revisited my old Great South Bay fishing haunt. My old canoe was long gone and I had no hand lines or fishing gear, but curiosity and nostalgia led me to seek out my old boat launching site near Smith Point. Was it still there? It was! There was a lot more asphalt roadway than in the past, and instead of sandy path to a beach with waving phragmites reeds, there was a formal launching site…But I found not one fisherman in sight on this warm sunny day after St Patricks Day.
The boat launching site was guarded by a town official, an old gentleman about my age.
“Where is everybody?” I asked.
“I’m right here every day” responded, the oldster, somewhat annoyed to be interrupted from watching a film on his iPhone.. He raised his glasses to his forehead then warned me: “So if you think you could launch a boat over there—-you should know you need a town permit first.”
“No, I have no boat. I was expecting to see a crowd of flounder fishermen down here on this lovely opening day.”
“Flounder?. Ain’t been a winter flounder caught here in decades. I guess about 1980 we seen the last of ‘em. Where you been?”
I was absent from the area I admitted to my self as I walked away astounded. Where had all those “inexhaustible” supply of flounders gone?
Gone the same way that other “sustainable” fish stocks have gone…to smaller and smaller fish, younger and caught at younger age until they simply disappear.
In the 1950s and 1960s winter flounder were thought to be inexhaustible. They were a popular food fish for the recreational and commercial fisherman. Their stocks were claimed to be inexhaustable. And for the fisherman young and old, there were no rules about, size, numbers to keep, or season of he year. Millions of fish were taken both commercially and for recreation in the 1980s, this once “sustainable” species collapsed by over 99% by 1980. What a loss?
Atlantic Salmon once spawned in our local streams, they are gone too, The common eel once a common “pest fish” which if caught made a tangle of you lines and hooks when landed, its slipper surface and wiggly snake like shape and was almost impossible to contain—and very difficult to remove it from the bottom tackle. They ae gone too.
The Atlantic Cod once were caught in local waters but are now only a faint memory of old timers.
In 2022 the population of river herring or alewife in Long Island sound collapsed to only a quarter of its former population. The river herring (alewife) are forage fish which are prey for other major game and commercial fish species,
Almost all of these population collapse stories are glibly related to climate warming or rising ocean temperatures, permitting authorities to ignore overfishing and blame the demise of fish stocks on something no one can control and no one has to respond to.
But a recent story about another “ inexhaustible”, “suststainably harvested” forage fish in the far off North Pacific made me think again about that nice square of tasty white fish I so enjoy at our local McDonald eatery. .
YAHOO NEWS in : “Fish in American Fishsticks is fueling a fight over trawling in Alaska”.(10-9-26) reports on a major fish controversy with a species we are all very familiar with. The fish is the speckled skinned Pacific pollock (Gaddus chalcogrammus), a 1 to 3 pound semipelagic member of the codfish family. The pollock is blessed (or cursed) with a very nutritious and tasty snow white flesh which makes it very desirable as human food. If you think you have never encountered one, you would be wrong, Yes pollock is not a local fish. It is caught in nets in for off Alaskan waters, filleted, frozen, then squared up to a good sandwich size, zapped with microwaves, stuffed into a soft bun, smeared with tartar sauce and sold to you in a small box. The Pacific Pollock is not just a common American food fish. It also feeds millions in the UK where it is made into the infamous and unappetizing “fish sticks”. In Germany it is consumed as white fish, and in Asia as faux crab meat (surimi) or faux lobster. Yahoo authors claim the pollock fishery is “the second largest fishery on Earth”.
To exploit this excellent source of fish protein for human consumption about 3.3 billion pounds (1,500,000 metric tons) of pollock are caught annually. Mc Donald’s uses tons of it for its Fish Filet, and other companies also exploit this fish stock as well. All of them claim the pollock fishery (worth about $500 million dollars annually) is sustainable. (With that amount of money involved….it would be difficult to find someone to claim otherwise) . But perhaps some unbiased ecologists and marine scientists might.
But “sustainable” is what was claimed about the Atlantic cod fisheries of the Grand Banks off Nova Scotia. It was sustainable until it collapsed in 1992 and fishing for cod was closed to all fishing with the hope that the stocks will return. But once a fish population has been decimated as a result of overfishing, other dynamics take over which make recovery less likely..
This author can state: catching 3.3 billion pounds of Alaskan Pollock (Gaddus chalcogrammus ) each year is very likely NOT sustainable. The pollock is a major forage fish preyed upon by other species. Pollock live and die at the mid point of the oceanic food chain. They range in the water column from near the surface in the North Pacific to depths from 300 to1000 feet,
As fingerlings, pollock feed on algae and floating crustaceans (zooplankton) such as copepods and krill (euphausiids) and as they get larger they take shrimp, amphipods, squid, and small fish such as Asian smelt, herring, and even sand launces. In turn, they are the major prey for for larger fish like salmon, cod, halibut, and sea birds, as well as marine mammals such as toothed whales, seals, stellar sea lions and orcas.
When pollock die, or are eaten by predators these wastes drift down to the sea bed where innumerable forms of benthic organisms consume them, benthic fish, detritus feeders, molluscs, sea bed invertebrates, and crustaceans (crabs). When humans remove 3.3 billion pounds of pollock the other forms of life and fish species dependent upon pollock are do not reproduce, and eventually expire as species.
Removing billions of pounds of a forage fish— a foundation species like pollock—means less available for species such as sea birds, salmon, crabs, halibut and orcas. Furthermore, such disruptions in the food chain place stress on the entire system. The entire ecology of the ocean is affected. A harbinger of such distress is the fact that some very recent study of the population (biomass) of pollock in the eastern Bering Sea report a 30% drop in biomass.
Although trawler fishing for pollock is less lethal than other forms of trawling—since pollock shoals swim at mid levels— trawlers drag their nets at these depths, not on the sea floor. U However pollock trawlers still catch millions of non target fish. Often these species are those which prey on pollock…salmon being one of the major species taken as “by-catch”. Once dragged up in a crowed net and spewed on the slimy deck the dead or dying salmon, halibut, etc. are then dumped overboard as waste. In 2025 the Alaska pollock fishery is claimed to have caught and dumped 44,000 metric tons of by catch (or 100 fully loaded 747-8 jet planes worth of smelly fish)
The salmon fisheries are declining each year in Alaska, in recent years the collapse has caused officials to close some regional fishing altogether. In 2024 Canada and USA instituted a seven year salmon fishing ban on the Yukon River. Salmon fishermen complain that with fewer pollock available as prey the obvious reason is fewer prey species for them to feed on. Government agencies (NOAA fisheries) which control how many fish can be harvested. These estimates are based on reports of fish landed (and the age and health of each species). These agencies often claim that the pollock population is stable and could sustain continued harvesting. In response to the declines in salmon NOAA biologists claim that it is climate warming is the cause of salmon decline ( but when there is no other palatable reason for anything bad these days anthropogenic warming gets the blame). But if that was so,,,pollock would be impacted by warmer water too. If that is true then both salmon fishing and pollock fishing should be limited.
State and Federal government agencies are just that “agencies of the government”. They are sensitive to public opinion and government pressures. They can not be trusted to make scientifically sound decisions.
You can not take billions of pounds of food fish out of a system and not have a deleterious effect on the population of the fish in that system dependent upon that food.
(Strange cases of dying sea mammals, orcas attacking sailboats, disappearing fish species all suggest environmental stress—though not related to the pollock fishery.)