Sunday, January 29, 2012

ZUBAYDAH, KIRIAKOU, OBAMA:VICTIMS, TORTURERS, WHISTLEBLOWERS



THE TORTURE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH,
AND THE PROSECUTION OF KIRIAKOU,
A CASE OF DUAL INJUSTICE

Why does Obama continue to shield law-breakers in the Bush Administration?

In Pakistan's border provinces, in 2002, a Saudi Arabian national of Palestinian descent, one Abu Zubaydah was reported to be hiding at a safe-house in a rural area. The CIA knew that their target had left his native land to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. They also had information that he was in charge of a training camp in the district. What they did not know was that during the Soviet-Afghan conflict Zubaydah had suffered a serious head wound which left him speechless and with near total memory loss. Though he was considered a top official of al Qaida by the Bush Administration, at the time, now we know that because of his head injuries and mental limitations Zubaydah was considered be worthless to al Qaida and he was never a member of that organization. In fact Dan Coleman, the FBI's senior expert on al Qaida, stated in 2009 that Zubaydah's importance was exaggerated by the Bush White House and that Zubaydah was only a "safehouse keeper" with mental problems, who "claimed to know more about al-Qaeda and its inner workings than he really did." (the quotes are from Wikipedia's Abu Zubaydah page)

During the CIA-insurgent firefight at the safe-house, Zubaydah was again severely wounded. After the final rush into the compound by CIA and Pakistani agents, the Pakistanis found a grievously injured Zubaydah, having been shot in the groin, stomach and thigh. They tossed the insensate man into a pick-up truck with the dead and wounded, where he would have died from his untended wounds. But the chief CIA agent, John Kiriakou, who led the assault on the safe house, recognized Zubaydah by his appearance and by the fact that a search of his pockets revealed he carried bank books from Saudi and Kuwaiti institutions rather than cash or untraceable funds as simple foot-soldier might have. Kiriakou, assuming that the near-dead man would be valuable if he could be kept alive, made sure his wounds were tended by the Pakistanis, then he flew in a surgeon from Johns Hopkins in the United States to further treat the man's serious wounds so that he would survive his passage out of Pakistan to a place where he could be adequately interrogated. When Kiriakou reported the capture to his superiors they were elated. Abu Zubaydah was considered a top-ranking al Qaida operative by the Bush administration, and a big catch for Kiriakou and the CIA. John Kiriakou was lauded for his work at the safe house fire-fight and for his investigative prowess in recognizing the captive's importance, and actions to save his life.

Unfortunately, Kirakou was disappointed when he was subsequently passed up for promotion. Zubaydah's supposed importance was based on the limited knowledge the USA had of him at that time, and the fact that President Bush was in need of some positive news about progress being made against al Qaida. Thus this badly wounded man, still suffering memory loss from his old head injury was, without further investigation, subsequently moved from Pakistan and sent on to severalnCIA "black" sites in Thailand, Poland, Garcia Diego, Guantanamo and elsewhere where he was subjected to fourteen different types of torture as well as water-boarding. (There is no question about whether Zubaydah was tortured, the descriptions of the series of "harsh" treatments he was subjected to makes disgusting reading.) It is well known that this prisoner was subjected to water boarding 83 times.

At the time, the actual transportation (rendition) of a US captive from a battle field to a place where that person would be tortured during interrogation was strictly illegal in the USA---that is until just before Zubaydah's rendition to Thailand. To facilitate this rendition, two of George Bush's attorneys in Washington, John Yoo and Jay Bybee conjured up legal cover, which, for the period of the Bush presidency, allowed the President and his team to claim that what they were doing to Zubaydah during his rendition and torture -was "legal".

About this time, back in Washington, top US officials including President Bush, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, and John Ashcroft having learned of Zubaydah's capture met to discuss the question of how to interrogate him to get the maximum amount of information. The setting for the meeting was a short period after 9-11, the President and his team were eager for any information about al Qaida, however tenuous and whatever means was used to obtain it. The CIA had proposed a series of "enhanced interrogation techniques" for Zubaydah which included forced nudity, loud music, sensory deprivation, temperature extremes, beatings, physical stress positions, such as forcing individuals into a "cramp" box where they could not stand upright or lie down, as well as water-boarding (a form of slow asphyxiation, using water to close off the passage of air to the lungs). Government documents now reveal that all these government officials (and high level Congressional leaders) were briefed about the proposal. Finally, with all of Bush's team in agreement, his national security advisor at the time, Condi Rice, finally told the CIA that the so called "harsh treatments" or "enhanced interrogation methods" we're acceptable to the President and they could go ahead.

Later, Dick Cheney, stated, "I signed off on it, so did the others." But John Ashcroft, the Attorney General at the time, perhaps concerned with the way the administration was running rough-shod over international agreements and the nation's laws warned: “Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly.”

[An interesting comment President Bush made at the time is illustrative of his thinking. A few days after Bush signed off on the CIA's torture proposal, Bush eagerly asked of one of his advisers "What information did you get out of him?" The advisor reported that little new information had been forthcoming, and the reason offered was that Zubaydah's unhealed wounds were causing him great pain and he had been given pain killers. (This may have occurred during the time he had been placed in a "cramp" box where his bent over positions for long periods had caused his unhealed wounds to open and to bleed again.) The interrogators claimed that the pain killers made Zubaydah drowsy and were slowing the interrogation process. Bush responded: "Pain killers? Why give him pain killers?" Zubaydah's drugs were immediately withdrawn and the harsh treatments continued. ]

Mr Ashcroft was perfectly right. History will not judge the Bush inner group of torturers kindly. Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice and Ashcroft all signed off on a process too horrible to envision and totally alien to American traditions of behavior--we are not torturers. Whatever various euphemisms they coined and used to describe it, "harsh treatment" or "enhanced interrogation" what was done to Zubaydah was torture. The old saw, stating : If it walks like a duck, quacks and flies like a duck--- it is a duck!" holds true. Today, we know (as did the vast majority of us who harbor some sense of morality and justice) that torture, aside from its moral repulsiveness, and legal prohibitions, was and remains ineffective and counter productive as a means of gathering information, and that any information "tainted" by torture is inadmissible as evidence in a trial. But then again we must recall that these people of the Bush Administration were the "great thinkers and deciders" who thought up the Bush tax cuts for the rich, the bank bailouts and the invasion of Iraq and other "boners". They are and remain an embarrassment to the USA.

The Bush administration sanctioned torture as a method of interrogation..bringing the USA down to the level of other torture states: the Nazis, Red Chinese, North Koreans, Soviet Russia and the Spanish Inquisition. History will remember them and those in the CIA and their contractors, physicians, psychologists and others who followed their illegal and immoral directions. The names Bush and all those others of his group will remain infamous like that of Dr. Josef Mengele of another age. Finally, the guilty should reflect on that ancient saying of the Greek philosopher, Sextus Empiricus (160-210 AD) "the stones of justice turn only very slowly but they grind exceedingly fine". So perhaps, like the war criminals of WW II, these criminals will worry to the end of their days if some one will come knocking on their door, with an arrest warrant from the international court.

But today, these miscreants are busily attempting to rewrite the history of their time in office, to protect their now shaken reputations. Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld have all made attempts at history-revising memoirs, but to no avail. There is too much evidence to whitewash away. They are patently guilty.

With the change of administration in 2010 one had hoped these practices of rendition and torture, the black sites, Guantanamo and the miscreants who developed this nightmare of torture cells would be exposed and punished. But the Obama Administration has continued to shield these former officials from the law. Were it not for the timidity and failure of those in the Obama White House, Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Powell, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft, Yoo and Bybee would have been condemned and perhaps be serving prison sentences rather than being free to publish their attempts at contrition an self-serving histories. Obama, and his Attorney General Eric Holder, has as he has in other areas, timidly shielded these guilty individuals from legal prosecution. The White House hides the crimes of its predecessors. Why? Timidity? Fear of reprisal?

Which brings us to the recent case of former CIA officer John Kiriakou. In the last few days the Obama Administration has proceeded with the case against former CIA officer Kiriakou who is charged with passing information, to journalists regarding the illegal torture of Zubaydah. He is also charged with providing the identity of a covert agent to a journalist, i.e. "outing" an agent (as Ambassador Wilson's wife Valery Plame was outed by VP Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby). The agent Kiriakou "outed" may have been involved in the torture of Zubaydah. Thus in this case the Obama Administration is pursuing a whistleblower while shielding wrong doers.

Here is the background on that case:
On January 23, 2012 Agence France reported that the CIA had charged John Kirakiou, former CIA agent and hero of the firefight with Abu Zubaydah, with espionage. As noted above he was the agent who "arrested a top al Qaida operative" and alerted his superiors in the CIA. But for some unknown reason Obama's White House turned its guns on this particular CIA agent. Why? Kiriakou has been charged with the most serious crime the CIA could throw at him, i.e. violation of the very rarely used Espionage Act of 1917, the very law used to convict the spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Conviction could land him in jail for 2o years. The CIA also fired his pregnant wife, who worked as an analyst for the agency.

What did Kiriakou do? First, he retired from the CIA after fourteen years and wrote a book about his experiences. This probably did not ingratiate him with his former supervisors. Second, in 2007 he made the grievous error of actually stating on ABC News in December, 2007 that Abu Zubaydah was "tortured." Whether he actually explicitlybspoke out the "t" word, rather than using the euphemism "enhanced interrogation techniques" is not important. Because he was the first CIA official to actually describe the water-boarding process in such great detail on public TV, so that even if he had not used the "t" word, any observer, even an addicted Fox News regular, would have understood that it WAS torture.

Thus had Kirikou actually tortured Zubaydah, perhaps gouging out an eye or attaching battery cables to his testicles, he would now be in the clear and would never have been indicted. Today he would not be sweating out how to pay for a top-notch defense attorney and fearing possible conviction and incarceration for 20 years. Then there is the financial impact, with his pregnant wife out of work too, both are living off their possibly meager savings. The actual torturers, their legal supporters and the former officials in government who gave the orders for torture have been consistently protected from prosecution by Attorney General Holder and President Obama. But one who was not involved in these despicable acts, but simply described what the actual torturers were doing, is the one they chose to chase down and hit with the Espionage Act. Perhaps it is because John Kiriakou, the person who has fourteen years of experience with the CIA, and was actually present when Abu Zubaydah was captured, has the credibility to speak about the subject as well as the crimes of his superiors--which he witnesed--that level of exposure is unwanted by the Obama Administration. Such an individual can do a great deal of harm to a timid administration, determined to sweep past misdeeds under the rug.

Thus former CIA hero John Kiriakou was fed to the sharks (or pushed under the bus) most likely to put a deep fear into anyone else in the CIA who might have the idea to expose wrong-doing in high places, and in the particularly embarrassing Zubaydah case.

Sadly, with this action, President Obama and Eric Holder are themselves sullied by shielding and protecting the Bush torture team. I had hoped for so much more from our young President. I had hoped for a change of course from that of the Bush Administration, but the President has only moved around the deck chairs. The ship is still on the same course Bush set. He kept much of the same Bush crew and they have continued to hold tight to the tiller. Except for some minor shifts in decor, Obama sits in the captain's chair on deck but has left the crew to mange the course and sails. Our ship of state still need a drastic course correction. But our hope that Obama will be able to make that transformation is slowing passing away like sea foam.

This case of Kiriakou underscores that fact. The President has directed his Attorney General to attack Kiriakou (a man who served his nation in his way honorably) rather than turn the power of the law and of the Presidency against those who have actually broken with our traditions, undermined our reputation as guarantors of international agreements, ignored our laws, soiled our reputations, and made hypocrites of us all. Add it to the list of disappointments, timid actions, no action, and reversals this young, intelligent and formerly promising President has rung up during his first three and a half years in office.

What we are all looking for is some sign that things will be different if he is re elected.


Get the picture?

rjk


Wednesday, January 25, 2012

BILL AND NEWT, WASHINGTON'S STEP-BROTHERS , BEWARE!

CLINTON AND GINGRICH, TWO PEAS AT OPPOSITE ENDS OF THE SAME POD

In the 2008 slap-stick buddy-comedy "Step Brothers" with comic stars Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly, Brennan (Farrell) and Dale (Reilly) are two very similar childish, spoiled, forty-year old men who still live at home with their single parents. They become step-brothers when their parents marry and unite two separate and unlike households into one. The film's often-seen promotional poster features Ferrell and Reilly posing, staring dumbly off into the distance with childish smiles on their faces in a mock brother's-pose for a family picture.

Having seen that silly, smiling-faced Step-Brothers poster, and soon after, watched the Gingrich response to his startling win at the South Carolina primary, I was struck by Newt's similarity in style, bluster, hubris and background to our former president, Bill Clinton. Newt and Bill were Washington DC's Step Brothers!

Looking back at the Clinton Administration from our present perspective from the bottom of an $18 trillion dollar hole created by the Great Recession, one's vision is barred by what today appears to us as a shining mountainous body, around which we can see little else. What looms so large for us today and blots out the true past is the presence of President Bill Clinton's budget surplus, and the remembrance of the fact that at the close of the G H W Bush years we entered into an era of financial growth (a happenstance) and expansion of which Clinton was the beneficiary. Unlike his successor, Clinton (who remains a talented politician) left office with an oft-touted budgetary surplus, an apparently sound economy, and the nation entering into what seemed a low-threat foreign landscape.

But Americans are crazy optimists and continually look back dumbly at our past, so most of us fail to recall (or ignore) the sleazy reality of those years and the deleterious effect Clinton's personal weaknesses as a leader had on the nation and its subsequent history. Forgotten or ignored by our politicians but not lost to our history books are the the facts around his personal foibles which led to an embarrassing and disgraceful impeachment, and that, rather than patriotically and honorably resigning his post (as had Nixon in an earlier time) to hand over the reins of government to Al Gore, his competent Vice President, admittedly one of the most effective and engaged VPs in modern presidential history, he chose to selfishly soldier on, as a weakened and undermined leader, having to make unpalatable deals with an emboldened Republican Party. The ultimate failure of his impeachment, left him in office leading a paralyzed and stunned nation. The episode demoralized the progressives, but stirred the independents and the Republican center and right-wing with renewed vigor and with a great determination to erase the Clinton legacy. It mobilized and radicalized the social conservative movement and led to the (questionable) defeat of Al Gore and the disastrous election of George Bush Jr.. in the following election. Some of the most serious mistakes which were to have severe consequences for our future, could be traced back to Clinton's self-serving, self-centered scandal-plagued administration and the decisions he made at that time. Signing the recall of the Glass-Steagal Act which was one of the main contributory causes of the Great Recession, is just one deed I can not forgive him for.

If your memory does not go that far back, recall that President Clinton was the first president ever to be impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance. Among his other "firsts" was that he was first to be sued for sexual harassment (and second to be accused of rape), and first to have his own legal defense fund, first to rent out the Lincoln bedroom, first to be held in contempt of court, and the first president to be disbarred from a state court and from the US Supreme Court. He also has the distinction of having the most number of friends and associates who had to take guilty pleas, and had the most number of cabinet officials of any past president to have been incarcerated for criminality. The administration was scarred by the fact that even the First lady was the subject of a criminal investigation. And as well, the administration was plagued by massive illegal-campaign-contributions cases. I bring up this unpleasant history to remind my readers of what can occur when a president has a "character issue" or a weak or non-existent moral compass, combined with much to learn about self discipline.

Circumstances now taking place in the Republican primaries lead one to look at the personal characters of some of those who have recently risen to prominence. One of these is a Clinton "step brother", former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton are two similar, childish, undisciplined, men, and like step-brothers Brennan and Dale their only differences are that they arise from opposite ends of the political spectrum. Both are erratic, arrogant, self-serving and based on their histories, patently unethical. These two men, are so similar, but from different political philosophies, they could have been the subjects of the Washington-edition of a Hollywood, remake of a comedy of manners called the "step brothers of politics".

Both men were born in the 1940s to struggling young women in out-of-the-way rural locations. Both mothers remarried and their young boys were raised by step-fathers whose names they assumed. Both were highly intelligent, talented and driven to succeed at all costs. Both seem to have had early discipline problems and lacked a dominant or prominent male figure in their early lives. Gingrich attended Emory, went on to graduate school at Tulane where he majored in history. Both Clinton and Gingrich failed to serve in the Vietnam war. Clinton was pilloried during his presidential campaign for the fact that he misled his draft board to obtain a deferment. Gingrich continued to take student deferments which kept him out of service, but did not volunteer to enlist. His motives, unlike Clinton's, were never questioned. Gingrich taught for some years, then was attracted to politics where he was elected to the House in 1978. Clinton went to University where he was a scholar and musician. Clinton finished his law degree at Yale. Both men entered politics, in the south, Gingrich from Georgia, Clinton from Arkansas. Both men had unsavory reputations as skirt chasers, which grew and intensified as their political power and opportunities for such behavior increased. Clinton was infamous for multiple affairs and long-term mistresses, while Gingrich was excoriated for extra-marital affairs and multiple marriages. Clinton at the height of his political power, was impeached as the result of an in-oval-office affair with a young female intern and for lying and obstruction of justice related to the investigation. Gingrich eventually reached the pinnacle of his career as Speaker of the House, from which, after four years, he was impeached for multiple ethical violations. He was assessed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines as a results of his ethical lapses.

Politically, both men could not be defined by their party affiliations. Clinton was a nominal Democrat but often practiced what he termed "triangulation"which found him in many instances more in tune with the Republicans than with his own party. Gingrich was a political amoeba constantly changing form and shape and political associations. Gingrich altered his religious affiliation from Baptist to Lutheran, and finally to Catholic. Both men could be characterized as having greater interest in their own well- being and career advancement than concern for that of the public good to which they had taken an oath.

And finally' when these two men found themselves out of office, both jumped into the revolving door of Washington's main business of making big money, by selling one's past contacts and connections to the highest bidder doing business in Washington. Both used their government knowledge and associations (and as a former President, Clinton used his foreign as well as Washington connections) to put themselves into the 1% income income-net wealth category by becoming "consultants and influence peddlers" in Washington. Both men wound up as multi-millionaires.

Thankfully, Clinton's history is in the nation's past. As a gravelly-voiced white-haired senior, and busy-body private citizen, this world- investment maven can not do our political system any more harm.

But as for Newt, Clinton's Republican-family "step brother"and mirror image, he is running for office now, and presents a grave threat to the union. We must force ourselves to recall what it was like to have an undisciplined, unstable, and erratic president in office. The history is there for us to examine. The fear is that Clinton's "step brother" ensconced within the White House and mantled with the political clout and the power of the Presidency, but with Clintonian character flaws and "brotherly" behavior, could impose a harrowing eight years on the nation which would make the flawed and scandal-ridden Clinton administration look like a Sunday school. That image is a frightening one that should be avoided.

Newt, himself, as an historian, would affirm that we should learn form our past and not ignore it.

Let's not go there.

Get the picture?

rjk

Saturday, January 21, 2012

THE GOLDEN RULE AS PRACTICED IN SOUTH CAROLINA

THE GOLDEN RULE AS PRACTICED IN SOUTH CAROLINA

"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, this sums up the Law and the Prophets". Matthew 7:12 (NIV)

South Carolina is deep in the Bible Belt, but one would not know it according to the response Congressman Ron Paul got when he invoked the Golden Rule during the Fox News-sponsored GOP debate on Monday. Paul responded to a foreign policy question, I recall it was on Iran, by invoking the Bible's golden rule. As we all know it states that we should treat others as we would ourselves like to be treated. That response got the crowd up on their feet in unprecedented anger and disagreement as they booed Paul vociferously for what the press and the other candidates saw as a vote-nullifying faux pas. But aside from the rude (non golden rule) behavior to a candidate who found it difficult to even complete his statement, the response reveals a great deal about the Republicans in South Carolina. One concludes that a significant group in the audience believes that we, as the world super power, are justified in punishing and attacking others wherever and however we please. Forget treating them like we would like to be treated...that suggests some kind of equality as members of the same species with similar human qualities. Perhaps the long insidious history of slavery in SC has seeped into the genetic pool in that state, making it difficult for many to raise themselves up from concepts which supports making one human group overlords over another.

Knowing something of that area, I suspect, those who booed probably profess to be life-long Christians, read the bible and religiously attend Bible class every Sunday, and bow their heads in prayer self-righteously at holy services. Then happily go out and load the bombs into B52s or man the Reaper drone controls, to drop ordinance on groups of innocent brown-skinned families as they sleep, or target and incinerate some "rag heads" working in their barren fields, and afterward these sorts may feel just fine and "christian-like" without a sense of remorse. But if some survivors of these attacks turn around, and following the writings of the very same prophets, "take an eye for an eye", then they are classed as "terrorists" and can be shot on sight, tortured, or stuffed away in a dank cell-hole to which the key is tossed away. Manifestly , these self-identified Christians in South Carolina, are unaware or unfazed by the illogic , inconsistency and repulsiveness, not to say unchristian behavior, of foreign policies they so avidly support.

One has to give Dr. Ron Paul credit. He remained unfazed, and continued courageously, and patiently on message. He was determined to indicate to the yahoos in the audience what the vast majority of the world population actually thinks about us and our willingness to bomb and kill, sometimes indiscriminately. Not the other members on the stage. They were much too much real politicians all, to even hint at the truth. They preferred to pander to the audience. One gets the sense that Gingrich, Romney, Santorum and Perry would find some way to agree with the principles expressed by Hitler's Brown Shirts if that would garner them a few more votes. Not so Dr. Paul, his message stays the same to whom he speaks and wherever he appears.

On Tuesday, appearing in Spartanburg, S.C., Ron Paul attempted to respond to his Monday-night intemperate audience. Answering a question about the US threat to impose an oil embargo on Iran, Ron said: “This is why I bring up the 'the golden rule', if we don’t want people to ban oil imports to our country, why should we do that to another country,” said Paul, adding “I don’t know why that is such a negative term for people to boo at that. ”

Being honest hurt Paul in South Carolina, where his brand of informed, consistent, and constitutional conservatism is not as popular as elsewhere. South Carolina is a poor state where there are many military bases, far too few good schools, and concentrations of former military families (with understandable biases and preformed ideas) who have chosen that state to retire in. But Paul 's message rings clear in other more progressive places in the nation. It's refreshing to know that even a libertarian conservative like Congressman Ron Paul can see the error of our foolish ways overseas. More power to you Congressman. Keep up the good fight. This nation needs to continue to hear your message throughout the coming campaign. Perhaps it will even help to put some timber up the back of Democrats in high office.

Get the picture?





Monday, January 16, 2012

A SANE IRAN FOREIGN POLICY

A BRIEF HISTORY OF MODERN IRAN
AND OUR CULPABILITY FOR THE PRESENT STALEMATE
AND A PLEA FOR A SANE POLICY

HISTORIC THREADS WHICH GO BACK TO 1953
In the working class neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York where I grew up during the years following WWII, the kids on my block replayed the major battles of WW II over and over again---in the empty lots scattered through our community. The post-war recession of the 50s left many vacant building plots in our part of the City, each had its pre-war building excavations, piles of dirt and fill, and weedy fields which we imagined as our Roman Campus Martius, El Alamein, and Iwo Jima. We fought the hated "Japs" and the "Nazees" over and over again. But before those battles, we argued strenuously among ourselves over who was going to be the "good guys". The "good guys" were by definition, ourselves, the Americans, who stood for all that was good and noblel and too were the invariable winners. But some of us--often me and some other smaller and younger kids, were forced into being the "bad guys". Our war games needed an "enemy force" and, an adversary was necessary, for the 'mericans to finally win, but we didn't like it. In those days, we knew very well who the "good guys" were. In the modern world, we can not be so sure any longer.

It's ironic that perhaps on those very days that my gang of Brooklyn boys were glorifying American GIs ad our wish to be the "good guys" in our children war games, 500 miles away in Washington, President Eisenhower and Foster Dulles were initiating actions in Iran that were to have far-reaching and long-lasting negative effects on our nation and economy and how we would perceive ourselves as Amercans.

OUR IRAN PROBLEM
In recent days, during the seeming interminal run up to our presidential elections, and when foreign affairs are discussed, we hear a great deal about Iran. On those occasions we are sure to hear the fearful sound of loose sabers rattling and much war talk from among the Republican supplicants, and similar vitriol about Iran from an uncertain White House. The latter, perhaps, is an attempt to dull the attacks of being "weak on Iran" leveled against the President by the present gang of Republicans to whom the word "moderate" is an epithet, and who proudly arrange themselves to the right of Genghis Khan on the political scale. Today, our Congressional representatives have proposed to embargo Iranian oil sales if they don't end their nuclear program, and in response, they menace us with the closure of the Straits of Hormuz. The Obama White House and Congress worry loudly about Iran achieving the technical ability to produce nuclear weapons. That is correct, the "technical ability" to produce a weapon. We know they do not HAVE nuclear weapons! Nor could they develop them in the very near future. US policy aims to prevent Iran from the technical know-how to produce nucleaR weapons. That is quite a different matter, and in this technical age probably not possible any longer. Though, in fact, in terms of international law, they, as do other nations, who are signatories of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty--have the explicit right to pursue the enrichment of nuclear fuel. Furthermore, by agreeing to that pact (unlike Israel who has not signed) they have an established right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. As part of that agreement they have opened their facilities to inspections to the UN nuclear watchdog group IAEA. So who is in the wrong here?

ISRAEL
But these legal niceties are ignored by Congress and do not satisfy Israel--the nuclear-armed US protege-state and hegemon in the Middle East (ME). That tiny nation with it's several hundred nuclear warheads and long range ballistic missiles is not in fact threatened by Iran, which has only defensive conventional weapons. Israel's massive armory is in fact what is destabilising the ME and generating the perceived need for WMD by some nations in that quarter. In the halls of Congress we often hear the case argued, that were Iran to achieve the ability to produce nuclear weapons, it would cause a "arms race in the ME". The proponents of this blather, convieniently forgetting that Israel has introduced those weapons long ago and is indeed causing that problem. It's neighbors rightly fear what it will do. It's history of occupation and expansion as well as unprovoked attacks on Iraq, Syria and Lebanon do not engenger confidence in its well-meaning future behavior. What Israel does fear from Iran's technical development is that it may have to contend with an opponent, which at some time in the future, may be able to mount a nuclear defense. Thus, it complains and whines of Iran's threat to its "existence" and openly plans and plots about a preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. These latter threats are a form of coercion against the Obama Administration (can we call it blackmail?) to encourage us to stiffen our resolve to expand sanctions and perhaps engage in another hot war in the ME. (See history of our sanctions below). But their real fear is the possible loss of their position as sole nuclear power in the region. Were that to happen they would be forced to honestly seek peaceful coexistence with their neighbors and perhaps even solve the Palestinian question fairly and equitably.

OUR THREATS ARE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE
Here in the USA, since the end of the Cold War, we also are now in the habit of and making military threats. We seem to have forgotten the disaster such bluster led us into in Iraq. The latest blather of this sort targets Iran. It is common to hear our own "iron lady", Madam Clinton intoning that "we are keeping all options on the table" indicating our willingness to engage in military solutions. Under such menacing circumstances, one wonders what world leader would not wish to have a good stockpile of nuclear weapons, just as an insurance policy against the possibility of US invasion, regime change and covert attacks. Iran just has to look across the desert at what happened to its immediate neighbor, Iraq, which was subjected to a violent unprovoked invasion, ironically not because it had WMD, but very much because we were quite well assured that it was weak militarily and had no nuclear umbrella. Thus our vitriolic threats and saber rattling toward Iran only make nuclear proliferation in the region more likely not less so. But rationality and common sense are not factors that control circumstances in these cases.

SANCTIONS HURT US AS MUCH AS IRAN
For one-third of a century, since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, we have sanctioned Iran. Over the years each new administration, regardless of what sense or nonsense it made has had to prove how "hard" on it was on Iran by adding to the list. Each successive administration has ratcheted up the pressure little by little. The reasons for these executive orders and Congressional directives seem to have been lost in the mists of time. But they plainly have had little impact and certainly not had the effects that the US would like...regime change, back to a pro-American despotic lackey like the last Shah. That is not going to happen, but other bad things could result.

Here below is a brief history of Iran sanctions:

1979~After the surprise eruption of demonstration in Iran and the exile of the Shah, President Carter permitted the Shah, who was seriously ill, into the US for medical treatment. His act of kindness precipitated a rumor that the US was planning another US backed coup to reinstate the Pahlavis. In response a group of radical students took action in Tehran by invading and occupying the US embassy. They embarrassed the US by parading the embassy staff in blindfolds and holding them hostage (to prevent the rumored coup) for 444 days. President Carter responded with Executive Order: 12170, which froze about $12 billion dollars in Iranian assets (gold, bank accounts, properties) in the US. Some claim about $10 billion is still held by the US.
.
1984~During the Iraq-Iran War (in which Iraq was the aggressor) the US increased sanctions against Iran which prohibited weapons sales to that nation--the victim of Iraqi aggression. It also opposed any loans to that nation by the IMF.

1996~US Congress passes a complex law imposing penalties on foreign countries which invest more than $20 million dollars in Iranian petroleum resources. Later modified and eased by Presidnet Clinton.

2000~Some sanctions were eased on pharmaceuticals, medical equipment, Persian rugs and caviar in response to complaints by imort companies.

2001~President George Bush reinstates sanctions of 1996 and 2000, which had been eased by President Clinton.

2004~US Treasury rules that US scientists collaborating with Iranian scientists could be prosecuted.

2005~President Ahmadinejad is elected and he lifts suspension of the Iranian uranium enrichment program which had been in place prior to his taking office. The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) reported Iran's non-compliance with UN Security council ruling.

2005~President G.W.Bush freezes assets of individuals connected with Iran's nuclear program.

2010~President Obama signs the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act which greatly increased restrictions on Iran.

2011-12 President Obama has sharply ratcheted up threats of sanctions by signing a bill that would embargo Iranian oil products and restrict other nations from

One reason for the failure of these efforts at long term punishment and coercion is that the Chinese and Russians, and other nations, rightly, will not cooperate in our act of vengeance and aggression. They see our behavior not as reasonable ans sound foreign policy to be supported, but more as a smokescreen to satisfy a politically worrisome US domestic audience. In this act they see-the "dog" (USA) being wagged by the "tail"--the Israelis and their congressional supporters.

Besides our efforts at sanctions against Iran, there is evidence that we are also conducting a secret cyberwar and even more revolting, clandestine bombings and assassinations in which Iranian nuclear scientists are targeted. (for the most recent assassination attack see the NY Times report today, January 10-11, 2012). Our Secretary of State, Ms Hillary Clinton, swears on a stack of bibles that we had nothing to do with this last heinous assassination. If we are not involved, certainly it is the Israelis who were the perpetrators. Their goal seems to be to provoke Iran's leaders into some overt military action which could become a causus belli for the west and generate a general war that would be a momentus miscalculation for the Iranians and for the US.

IGNORANCE OF IRAN
Our citizenry, here in the USA, are virtually ignorant of the Iranian nation and of its recent history. Posing the question of why they hate us so much to either my working class relatives or professional neighbors, elicits pretty much the same responses. My golf-buddy Charley F is typical. "Ain't that the fundamentalist Islamic nation that invaded our embassy in '79? They hate us because we are free and we live good lives." or another one, "They are just envious of us and our military power." or " They want to wipe Israel off the face of the earth." "They are a pariah nation ruled by fundamentalist theocrats." and the always common response. "They are sponsors of terrorism". Ahh life is so nice and simple when you are ignorant...solutions are so easy to come by....and so dangerous.

WHY DO THEY HATE US?
As noted above, Iran has been on our enemy list since 1979. Why?


WHY THEY HATE US? A FRANK HISTORY OF OUR INTERACTION WITH IRAN
The real history of our nation's relationship with Iran is not that long, but is very revealing.

The Iranians we're of no consequence to us until about 1953 when during the Cold War we joined with the British to overthrow a legitimately elected democratic Iranian parliamentary government and replace it with a brutal dictatorship. To make matters worse, after installing our handpicked man, we sent our General Norman Schwarzkopf (father of Stormin' Norman) there to train their brutal secret police force to assure us that the new man we installed as Shah would have all the necessary means to keep a lid on any problem dissidents. That worked,for us, at least, and as long as the Shah did what he was told about his oil supply and prices we were fine friends for some quarter of century from 1953 to 1979.

But when the Shah was overthrown and our embassy invaded by Iranian students who impudently took American personnel hostage for 444 days, we did not like that much. They embarrassed us. We were not able to mount a punitive military response, that made us look weak. We did not like that. We lost the Shah who was doing our bidding and we (and our oil companies) lost the sweet deal they had and the control of the Iranian oil fields. And we didn't like that either. The Iranians got away with kicking the big guy on the block in the shins and then running away. Since that time, with those thorns festering in our side, we continued our angry vengeful relationship with Iran (viewing them as irreconcilable enemies). It is time we changed these circumstances for our own benefit, as well as for world peace. Without a drastic change of our course, the road ahead leads only to war. That would be a"catastrophe" as was stated so succinctly by Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov just yesterday (January 18, 2012).

Here, below I offer some facts about Iran's recent history that we should all be aware of as responsible citizens.

THUMBNAIL HISTORY OF IRAN
Iran is a large mostly mountainous country, equal in area to that of the UK, Germany, Spain and France combined, and with a population of nearly eighty million. Iran (derived from) "Aryan" the land of the the Aryans, was the ancient Persia of the Greek historian, Herodotus (484 to 425 BC) who wrote of the Persian wars in his"Histories". Iran is one of the oldest nations, having been first united under a Persian King around 650 BC and has continued as a unified nation in some form or another since that time.

In terms of resources, aside from Saudi Arabia and Russia, Iran has the good fortune to have one of the largest reserves of oil and gas in the world. For that reason, and it's position in the middle east, close to major waterways, and also with a littoral on both the shores of the Caspian Sea and on the Red Sea (one of the great waterways of the modern world) which puts Iran at the center of major oil transport routes.

ANCIENT HISTORY
Iran is home to one of the oldest continuous major world civilizations, dating back to 4000BC. It has been overrun frequently by other powers, but has essentially maintained its Persian identity over time. After millennia of existence as a powerful empire, Alexander the Great invaded ancient Iran from the west and defeated the Persian Achaemenid Empire in 330 BC. Alexander ruled for a short period, and after his death, in 323 BC, he as succeded by the Selucid Empire. They were followed by successive Parthian and Sassanid rulers whose reigns lasted for over 1000 years. In 633 AD, Arab conquerors from the east swept away earlier rulers and established an Islamic caliphate. That event was followed by a period of Islamization of the earlier Persian cultures. A period of foreign occupation and minor dynasties followed during the Middle Ages when what would be modern Iran was incorporated into a larger entity. In 1501, Iran was again reunited under the Savafid Dynasty which brought the Shia branch of Islam to Iran. The nation remained a monarchy, ruled by a Shah, from that period to 1979, when as a consequence of the Iranian Revolution, Iran became an Islamic Republic.

The late 18th century to early 20th century was a time of European colonization of the Middle East, when Russia, France and Great Britain began to carve out economic realms in the region. At that time the Shia Qajar Dynasty ruled Iran (from 1796 to 1925). As a result of these incursions Iran (Persia) lost control over several provinces. In the early 20th century, the Qajar Shah was forced into granting a constitution which restricted the monarchy and established a parliament which was first convened in 1906. When oil was discovered in Persia in 1908 by the British, a contest, the so-called "Great Game", developed between Russia and Britain for control of Persia and its oil resources. The contest which pitted Russia and Britain against each other for resources has continued since then with only the name of the great power-players changing but little else for over a century of conflict.

During WW I, Persia remained neutral, but was occupied by both British and Russian forces which divided Persia up into areas of influence--in total disregard to the nation's and its leaders wishes. After the Russian revolution of 1918-1919, that nation's troops were withdrawn and Britain ruling alone attempted to establish a protectorate there, but was unsuccessful. That failed attempt destabilized the nation which, coupled with an economic downturn at the end of the War, as well as general dissatisfaction with the Shah, led to a coup by military officers. That putsch established Reza Khan, a former Persian Cossack brigade officer, (family name Pahlavi), as a virtual dictator for the next 20 years. But by 1925 Khan had consolidated enough power to declare himself Shah of Iran. He incorporated all the extravagant trappings of the ancient royalty of Persia, to whom he had no relation. Calling itself the Pahlavi Dynasty, the Shah installed a throne room and a copy of the ancient "Peacock" throne, as well as many other wasteful practices of an eastern potentate.

RECENT HISTORY
The Pahlavi Dynasty lasted from 1925-1979. Reza Khan established a strong central government that was nationalistic, anti-communist, and secular. He ushered in the modern world with trains, buses, telephones and electrical service. To maintain his authority, he established a strong military as well as strict censorship. As in other dictatorships, he suppressed political dissent and his governmente was rife with corruption. His efforts at modernization and westernization, were imposed in an attempt to impress and mollify his western supporters. To bolster his bona fides as a client state with the west, he attempted to make far-reaching cultural changes in a backward, religiously conservative population. He pressed for wide reforms in religious practices, and to force men to wear hats with brims (like the western cultures he admired) and to introduce chairs into mosques for seated worship, and he insisted that females mix with males in general public, and for women to abandon the hijab. These pronouncements were met with strong resistance from the clergy and peasant classes. In 1935 the clergy, the devout, and religiously conservative elements, particularly in the bazaars and religious shrines rose up in violent protest. The Shah's troops put down the riots with force and hundreds were hurt and dozens killed.

By 1941, as if a replay of the first world war, the combatants in WW II saw Iran as a source of much-needed petroleum--and a resource that had to be denied to the Germans. The newly completed internal rail lines were also needed as a supply link to transport vital supplies from the Caspian Sea to the Gulf for the war effort. These reasons prompted the English and Russian allies to jointly invade Iran in September 1941. The invasion destabilized the already weak government and Shah Reza Khan who resisted the invasion and was subequently forced to abdicate.

The Shah's pro-British son, Mohammed Reza Shah Pahalvi, seen as a more controllable, malleable protege than his father, was enlisted by the allies as "their man". After the British occupation, and while the war was still raging in 1941, the son was installed as the new Shah. He did not disappoint the British. For certain emoluments to his personal accounts, he permitted the Anglo Iranian Oil company great latitude in exploiting Iranian oils fields as well as a very liberal, pro-British price-structure for the oil they expropriated. The young Shah, happy with his well-financed position, and his ballooning personal wealth, permitted the Iranian parliament to operate much on its own in minor domestic matters, while he controlled the powerful secret police and made major foreign affair decisions in consultation with the British. That way (it seemed) everyone was happy. For a while at least. However, as the years passed the nation became increasingly restive and the political situation more unstable. Between 1947 and 1951 there were six new parliaments and changes of prime minister.

Much of the political unrest was a direct outgrowth of the oppressive, dictatorial nature of the regime, as well as the citizens common knowledge concerning the financial arrangements the Shah had made with the British and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company regarding oil exploitation and oil prices which were heavily slanted to the benefit of the exploiters.

MOHAMMED MOSADDEQ
Mohammed Mosaddeq, who was to play a critical role in modern Iran's history was born into a promient family in Tehran and was trained as a legal scholar, who taught Law at the University of Tehran. After this period as a legal scholar, Mosaddeq entered politics where he had a long career as a state governor, administrator, and member of Parliament. In April of 1951 Mosaddeq's party gained a large majority in parliament and Mosaddeq became Prime Minister.

In 1950, beyond Iran's borders to the north, change was coming to conservative and isolated Saudi Arabia. After observing many years of profitable exploitation of Arab oil by the American oil company, Aramco, which discovered oil there in 1933, King Saud and the royal princes were displeased. They wanted more of the proceeds of the wells for themselves. In 1950 they threatened their long-time partner, the Arab American Oil Company (Aramco) with nationalization. In the ensuing negotiations, faced with the unpleasant possibility of being pushed out of the country, and of losing their entire investment in Saudi Arabia, they had to compromise. The princes bargained the company executives into proposing a 50/50 split with Saudi Arabia (SA) for its oil resources. The offer was accepted and Americans continued operating the fields.

The results of the SA negotiations with Aramco reverberated through the Middle East and in 1951, after elections, when Prime Minister Mosaddeq found himself with a parliamentary majority, he used that political asset to press his policy against the British (Anglo-Iranian Oil Company or AIOC) firm which was perceived (accurately) as unfairly exploiting the Iranian oil reserves and paying only a pittance to the Iranians for each barrel pumped. With the recent success of Saudi Arabia in winning concessions from the Americans on their oil prices, the Iranians sought a similar deal. However, in actual negotiations, unlike what happened in SA, the threat of nationalization of the Iranian oil fields, brought a harsh British response, rather than capitulation like the Americans. The British would not negotiate. The Iranians were forced to proceed with the their threat of nationalization. At that point the Iranians probably would have agreed to a 50/50 split of profits. With the uncompromising British response raging in the public press, the concept of nationalization became enormously popular in Iran, in which the popular opinion had always been that the British were invaders who were stealing the nation's wealth. The oil funds, draining out of Iran into the hands of the British, many saw as being better used to alleviate the oppressive poverty in their own nation. On the British side their obduracy was largely based on their weak financial situation and the fact that they were recovering from a disastrous war. Nationalization was seen as the breach of a solemn contract and theft of a resource the Britiish had discovered, developed and needed desperately. AIOC's loss of Iran's oil would create an enormous impact on the British nation's balance of payments and their military effort against communism. Nationalization would have been a financial disaster for the British. They acted accordingly to protect it. They pulled all the strings they could to punish the Iranians.

When Iran fired the British technicians and oil field workers, Mosaddeq assumed that the Iranians would be able to hire others from other nations, but the British prevented that by applying pressure on oil-consumer European nations to block their workers from entering Iran. When the Iranians finally got their wells pumping again, the British placed a blockade on Iranian oil. When Italy sent workers and continued to purchase Iranian oil, British destroyers escorted the Italian tanker into a distant port and sequesterd the ship, it's crew and cargo. That action effectively closed down the Iranian oil exporting ports. And a worldwide boycott of iranian oil followed. But Mosaddeq did not relent and the nationalization proceeded.

When the oil embargo failed to get the results the British sought, they turned to clandestine acts of sabotage and a plan to overthrow the popular Mosaddeq government. At the urgings of the British, the Shah, acting outside of the law and without a parliamentary vote, summarily removed Mosaddeq from power. The nation responded to this illegal act with massive anti-Shah demonstrations. The resulting popular uprising frightened Shah Pahlavi into relenting and returned Mosaddeq to his position as prime minister. Political unrest continued and in 1952 during the nationalization, the Shah himself was forced into a brief exile as a result of another popular uprising and a palace coup by the imperial guard.

It was at this juncture that the British turned to the Americans. President Eisenhower had been recently elected and unlike his predecessor he was favorale to action against Tehran. Eisenhower, in talks with British PM, Winston Churchill and with the collusion of the exiled Reza Pahalvi agreed to enlist the USA's CIA to put into effect a secret plan to bring down the Mosaddeq government. It was the first use of the CIA to overturn a legitimately elected foreign government--but not the last.

CIA AND THE AJAX PROJECT
Known as the "Ajax Project" by the CIA and in Iran as the "Coup of 28 Mordad" a reference to the Iranian calendar, the concerted CIA attack on Mosaddeq took place on August 19, 1953. On that date, the British MI6 and Americana's CIA selected an Iranian general to cooperate with the plotters against his own government. For this person, they chose a lower echelon general, one Faziollah Zahoedi, who it turns out was a known former pro-Nazi. Zahoedi accepted more than five million US dollars from the CIA to cooperate as the prime minister to replace Mossadeq. A "royal decree" was written up by the CIA plotters removing Mosaddeq and signed by Pahlavi. CIA agents hired common thugs, criminals, as well as clergy and military officers willing to take bribes to take part in street demonstrations against Mosaddeq. The plot almost failed when CIA elements attempting to arrest Mosqsddeq at his residence, were themselves arrested by the Imperial guard. The CIA then turned to some of the most feared mobsters in Teheran who were paid by the Americans to stage more violent, pro-Shah demonstrations and acts of vandalism. During these American planned, staged and coordinated demonstrations more than 800 Iranian civilians were killed. The coup was successful and soon afterward, Mosaddeq himself was arrested, tried and convicted of treason. He was jailed for three years where he was kept in solitary confinement, and then placed under house arrest for the rest of his life. He died in 1967, never having seen the end of the Shah's illegitimate rule. Some of his associates were rounded up, tried, tortured and executed.

The coup d'état engineered by the CIA resulted in the alteration of a constitutional monarchy into an authoritarian one. After the coup the oil resources were shared jointly by the US and British. The USA trained the Iranian military and developed the internal security service SAVAK, the Shah's repressive secret police. The father of one of our nation's heroes of a later war in Iraq, Major general Herbert Norman Schwartzkopf, was tapped by the CIA to bring the Shah back from exile and to train the secret police contingent that was to become SAVAK. Shartzkopf who organized the secret police force, brought his expertise as a former Chief of Police of New Jersey to that job. Shwartzkopf's creation was to become a 5000 man secret police force with almost unlimited power to arrest and interrogate. We can imagine, from our experience with elements of our own American forces in Iraq, which had similar unlimited powers, to what levels of bestiality and depravity it must have descended. With our experiences with the US Iraqi prison at Abu Grahaib, it is easy to understand the level of fear the Iranian secret police must have engendered in the Iranian dissident population. It is claimed by reliable sources, that SAVAK under the Shah was responsible for the torture, death and disappearance of thousands of the Shah's political enemies.

This brutal and potent instrument of suppression used by the Shah, remained a potent source of discontent with the public. As well, was the public knowledge of the continued illegal exploitation of Iranian natural resources by foreigners (and now after the Ajax Coup, the oil was being shared by both British and American companies). Furthermore, the obvious heavy hand of the CIA and American business interests in the installation of the Shah, the creation and training of SAVAK by the Americans, as well as the CIA coup that brought down the popular Mosaddeq government remained issues which festered in the public's mind. These circumstances would eventually become the key causes of fear and dissatisfaction which would bring down the Shah's rule.

FALLOUT AND BLOW BACK OF AJAX PROJECT
The coup of August 1953 instigated the overthrow of a legitimately elected democratic government and saw it replaced by an autocratic, authoritarian monarchy supported by the US and beholden to the needs of Aramco and AIOC and the other oil-dependent European states which participated in the coup in some way. The Shah was correctly perceived as a puppet of the US and the oil companies. The US which had engineered the defeat of an elected democratic government and replaced it with a autocratic regime supported this new entity lavishly with military aid and financial and technical help to its secret police. The US efforts aided and abetted a brutal and oppressive regime. In Iran the US was no longer seen as a force for freedom and justice, but as the instrument of oppression, torture and brutality. The Shah did not help himself either. His regime was not only oppressive,but was corrupt and extravagant. His financial policies led to inflation, and food and other shortages. His over-ambitious domestic policies were set pieces to please his western supporters, but which greatly antagonized his own people and particularly antagonized conservative religious Iranians and the clergy. The Shah's enemies were brutally suppressed by SAVAK as were Marxists and Socialists. All these factors eventually led to the unrest which culminated in the overthrow of the Shah in the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The Shah went into exile. His brutal regime and his dynasty was over. But the lingering effects of the America's exploitation of the nation's resources, the CIA led coup, its support for a dictatorial regime and training and support for SAVAK were to continue to fester in the Iranian body politic. These effects would continue to affect the perception of the US in Iran for decades to come.

AFTERMATH
In 1980, during the chaos associated with the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution the previous year, Iran's neighbor to the west, Sunni dominated Iraq, under the leadership of Saddam Hussein, with which that nation had a long term border dispute, attacked without warning, taking a large chunk of Iranian territory. Iran in the throes of the revolution was unprepared for the war. Iraq's army was bigger and better armed. The US still seething from the loss of a key ally and client state in the Shah's Iran, tilted toward Iraq--the aggressor- during the war. There is some evidence suggesting that elements within the Jimmy Carter administration gave Saddam the 'green light' to go to war with iran. We supported Iraq during the eight year war, with war materiel, satellite intelligence, and overseeing transfer of war supplies from third parties that were destined to Iraq. We are reputed to have supplied the Iraqis with experimental poison gases which they used against Iran's forces. The US navy acted to convoy ships and oil tankers through the Straits of Hormuz where, when it encountered Iranian ships, it would sink them. There were several incidents in which the US and Iran clashed at sea. Later in the war, US vessels would typically cruise the Straits, within Iranian territorial waters, to lure out small Iranian gun boats which they would then target. During one such incident, the US Navy frigate Vincennes, cruising inside Iranian waters, shot down an Iranian commercial airliner carrying 292 passengers and crew, claiming at first that its target was an attacking Iranian fighter jet. That account was later proved to be untrue. The US never apologized for the unprovoked attack on a civilian aircraft. President G.W. Bush later awarded the clearly culpable commander of the Vincennes with a promotion. The war lasted eight years and cost the lives of betwwen 500,000 to a million Iranians and about a third of a million Iraqis. The war expenses topped more than a half a trillion US dollars for each country. Both countries suffered severe economic consequences after the war.

THE COVOLUTED TENTACLES OF HISTORY
That first Iraq-Iran War during which we secretly and overtly contributed arms and materiel to Iraq, ended in stalemate, but ended with an emboldened and much better-armed Iraq. These were circumstances, in part, we contributed to and encouraged. Our policies in Iran and Iraq were to have unhappy consequences. They led eventually and inevitably to the two US-Iraq wars, costing our economy trillions of dollars and thousands of young American lives (and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives). These unfunded wars, combined with the effects of lower taxes for the wealthy, and other domestic polices, generated huge federal deficits. The war costs and the bulging Bush deficits brought on by the Bush-policy of lower tax revenues for high income citizens were two of the three contributing causes of the Great Recession of 2007-8. Those problems were compounded by President Obama when he bailed out the banks and Wall Street early in his term. Indeed, our problems with Iran have led to hard times for us, as well as unhappy ones for Iran, creating enormous hardships for them and their neighbors, and unstability in the rest of the Middle East.

Looking back, one might say one of our greatest mistakes was implementing the misguided CIA plan to destabilize and overthrow Iran's stable, democratically elected Mosaddeq government. It seems almost as if God or Allah is punishing us for our misdeeds. But our hubris and inability revise a course of action once in play (even after it is obvious it is wrong and unhelpful) and the powerful role the American oil industry plays in our foreign policy decisions were also to blame.

Therefore, let us not compound our Iranian misdeeds and self inflicted wounds by further ill-advised military and/or covert CIA interventionism in Iran.

We should turn to a new policy with regard to Iran. Say no to Israel, say no to an oil embargo of Iran. Say yes to a change of direction, and a new page in our unhappy history with Iran.

As Ron Paul has said on the Republican campaign trail, "we must begin talks with the Iranians". Our goal should be a stable, Middle East. We can go a long way toward that goal by confidence boosting talks and who knows possibly a non-agression pact with Iran? Then what need would they have for nuclear weapons? What choice do we have? Our present course is set towards unrelenting war and conflict. Our nation and the rest of the world can can no longer afford that route. It's time to push that tiller way over to port and change course.

Get the picture?

RJK




Thursday, January 12, 2012

A GEOLOGISTS MEMOIR OF A MATACUMBA KEY FISHING TRIP

GEOLOGIZING ON A BIG GAME FISHING TRIP TO THE FLORIDA KEYS.

In May of 2011 I was fortunate enough to have been invited to attend one of Jim Miller’s celebrated fishing trips. Our gang of retirees, seamen, businessmen, entrepreneurs and their sons wended our way south in early Spring around Father's Day to spend a few days on Matacumba Key in the Florida Keys using Bud and Mary's Marina as our fishing base. Our goal was guided-back country-fishing from fast moving skiffs in fabulous Florida Bay. Our quarry being tarpon taken on light tackle and other fabled game fish, but there was so much more. As is my habit, I jotted down notes of our activities and took photographs to aid my memory. With those sources next to my typewriter and pleasant visions of wide open shallow seas dotted with tiny tropical keys, I have put together this incomplete and inadequate memoir of a pleasant experience. My purpose was and remains to somehow fix this fine adventure in my mind, and return to mentally enjoy it again and atgain. Perhaps some of my jottings here may please you, my readers, as well. Here, below is what this author, a former marine scientist, pacticing geologist and nature lover absorbed during those warm sunny days on the Bay. Though the foregoing describes what captured the interes of this author-- the Bay. its physical setting and geology and some of its wildlife--it unfortunately leaves out the pleasant comradeship, excellent conversations, joyful friendships. new an old..and great food. Those must wait for another blog.

FLORIDA BAY

Florida Bay is a shallow, shelf-lagoon, encompassing a triangular area of over 1,100 square miles enclosed by the graceful arc of the Florida Keys on the south and the Everglades to the north. The rich mix of marine and freshwater environments, shallow, crystal-clear water, and abundant sunlight provide a perfect environment for a complex web of marine life including marine plants, and a host of organisms from tiny foraminifera to manatees, dolphins, giant tarpon, sharks, rays and even twelve-foot long prehistoric sawfish. The calcareous bottom mud provides a substrate for turtle grass and manatee grass which carpet the bottom and provide both food and cover for many other forms of life. As in other estuaries, fresh water mixes with sea water to provide a wide range of salinities to which many different species are adapted. The Everglades, just to the north, are the source of fresh water which flows southward to mix with seawater from the Gulf. Thus the salinity of the Bay increases toward the south providing a variety of salinity concentrations suitable for many different life forms. In summer, when the sun heats and evaporates Bay water salinity tends to increase from normal sea water levels (@33 parts per thousand) to concentrations sometimes two or three times that level. On the other hand, during periods of heavy rainfall, salt concentration in some parts of the Bay may fall to well below normal. The plants and animals associated with the Bay are mostly adapted to these fluctuations and thrive in the area.

Because of its shallow depth, one sees a great deal of bay-bottom. The view is a fleeting as one skims and bounces over the surface at 35 miles per hour, your skiff driven by big twin outboards, pushing up a white rooster tail and making a wide wake. But even in passing it is apparent how shallow the Bay is and what it is like. Here and there where boat props gouge into its surface one can see that it is composed of a white lime mud. My sources say that mud may be tens of feet thick, and thicker in the west than in the east. The mud banks have been cut and filled by currents and are somewhat controlled by the limestone bedrock underneath the mud. There are shallow ridges and deeper basins. In places, storms scour coarse lime-sand and mud from one place and pile it in another. When that happens the mud banks might be high enough for Mangroves to grow on them, once they take root on the banks…that’s how the islands form.

The Bay's shallow water protected it from incursion. Were it deeper it would have been exploited for its fish and open space long ago, and would not be the isolated, pristine place it is now. The fact is that its shallow depth has prevented human occupation and incursion of criss-crosssing, pollution-spewing big boats which can not navigate in the Bay. Even the small-draft Florida Bay skiffs, which draw only a foot or more, can become trapped in the shallows. The skiffs and the fishing guides navigate the Bay by keeeping a mental map of each of the many channels and deeps using that knowledge to get from one place to another. There is no straight-line course through the Bay--one must follow the complex maze of channels and "lakes" to safely get from one place to another..that's one reason why one needs a knowlegeable guide to fish there.

Another factor is the tide which compounds the depth problem. In the Bay itself, between the banks and flats are basins. “We call ‘em “lakes,” says Jim Wilcox our Florida Bay Fishing Guide. “The water in the lakes can be six feet deep at low tide. More than once, when fishin’ was so good I didn’t pay attention to the falling tide, I actually got trapped in Rabbit Basin and had to wait till the tide came up before I could navigate out of there.”


FLORIDA BAY KEYS
Jim Wilcox our guide remarked that it was the Mangrove roots, especially Red Mangrove, which act to trap wave-and-current-washed mud and sand. This builds up around the roots and as time goes by, the plants may form a living ring around the sand bank on the ridge. High tides and storm surges wash sediment into the mangrove ring. Mangrove roots act to trap sediment and cause the outer rim of the island to grow upward. The process tends to produce islands with more a less a “dish” or “platter” cross section--high on the edges and shallower in the interior. But in time, the interior fills up too. Different plants take up residences as the mud and sand accumulates. Black Mangrove prefers slightly higher or less inundated soils, and White Mangrove prefers to have its roots dry out once each day. So in time a natural sequence of Red mangrove, Black Mangrove and White Mangrove slowly form to completely or nearly occupy much of the area of the islet or key.”

Following up on what Jim said, I did some research and discovered the following about mangroves.

The Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) has a reddish bark and can grow to 50 feet, but is most often a shrub. It grows closest to open water. And is sometimes called the “walking tree,” since it has multiple “prop” roots, that help to stabilize the tree in soft mud and which encourage sediment to settle around its roots. These aerial roots also help provide oxygen to the roots, which are either totally underwater or if in mud are often growing in anoxic conditions. In addition, these roots filter out salt from the salt-water environment they most often grow in. This is one of the few trees that has its seeds (propagules) actually germinate while on the tree. See this site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/coastal/habitats/mangroves.htm


The Black Mangrove (Avicennia germinans) is taller than the former species, growing to 60 feet in height (but often less in Florida Bay). It is also more likely to be growing higher above sea level, or further inland where its roots are in dry or semi-dry substrate at least at low tide. It has a dark-gray or dark brown to black bark and no prop roots, but it does have tube-like structures called pneumatophores which the plant sends up vertically from the roots and into the air, and which serve to provide air to roots which are constantly wet and in water with little or no oxygen. The Black Mangrove has hairs on its under-leaf- sides which excrete excess salt. Crystals of salt can often be seen collecting there. The salt is pure sea-salt and this “mangrove salt” was harvested by early Florida colonists as an important source of edible salt. The Black Mangrove also has seeds which germinate while still on the trees.

White Mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) is smaller than the other trees and grow in areas which are flooded less frequently. This species lives where the substrate drys out every day. The trunks and branches are often twisted and misshapen. This characteristic is often attributed to the poorer soils and more variable soil-moisture and salinity concentrations where it grows, as well as its exposure to strong winds. The petiole of its leaves have two small glands near the base of each leaf (called nectaries) which excrete salt. Salt crystals may be seen near them and on the base of the leaf. It typically has no prop-roots or pneumatophores but it does have many lenticles or breathing pores on the lower surface of the trunk to provide needed oxygen when water levels are high.

Jim described the Bay bottom topography this way. “It’s like the rough skin of an old ‘gator’ or salt-water ‘croc’ with long ridges, and spines and low places in between. And the whole ‘gator skin’ is carpeted with a thick layer of lime-mud. So’s all the ridges and hollows and swales are smoothed out a bit to make the average depth about three feet while the deep basins are me’be nine or ten feet. If it warn’t fer the mud, you guys could walk out here ta fish.” He giggled at that, adding, “But the mud’s a lot deeper than the water..so don’t try that.”


THE STUFF BELOW THE MUD
I found Jim to be correct about the bottom being like a “gator skin”--see above. The mud has its own ups and downs but it also sits on top of an even more corrugated surface of basement rock. Geologists tell us that Florida Bay has a rock basement of limestone which can be traced to a depth of 20,000 feet or more. They have termed the top-most stratum, the ‘Miami Limestone’. This layer was deposited during the last ice age (Pleistocene Epoch) when sea level rose and fell in the region by as much as 200 feet. During that time there were long periods when some of the beds that would be the Miami Limestone were exposed to aerial erosion and chemical alteration. As in all such places where limestone sits exposed to the air, naturally acidic rainwater and humic acids (from decayed vegetation) can dissolve the calcreous surface rock and permit acid water to seep downward through naturally occurring joints and cracks. In the process, the flow of water may hollow out deep holes, or create large solution cavities. We will recogize these features elsewhere as subterranean caves and caverns. Often the rroofs of these caves collapse as a result of the weight of the overlying rock The result is to create an irregular surface with ridges and hollows known as “karst” topography. These processes affected Florida Bay to create that "gator skin" texture Jim, our guide spoke of. That surface was finally inundated in the last several thousand years and marine lime-mud carpeted the entire area. The underlying karst topography is the factor which controls the locations of the two-hundred or so “keys” or mud islands in the Bay and the intervening deep basins or “lakes”. The keys are generally located on the resistant higher ridges and the solution cavities or depressions in the underlying Miami limestone (of Late Pleistocene) control the locations of the deep holes and basins. Another interesting fact is that the underlying Pleistocene Epoch, Miami Limestone slopes gently from east to west, as a consequence, the mud deposits are thicker in the west than in the east.

When I mentioned that fact to Jim on one of our forays out into central Florida Bay near Rabbit Basin, he pushed his long billed fishing cap off the side of his head for a good scratch, then without a response went back to “anchoring” the skiff in the shallow water near a small “fishin’ hole” using the long boat push-pole. All of the Florida Bay skiffs carry these boat-long push-poles secured to their side decks. I noticed Jim was easily able to poke the near 20 foot skiff-pole down a good ten feet in soft mud in the shallows around Rabbit Basin and elsewhere. The Florida Bay fishing skiffs can be rendered stationary by stabbing the long, boat pole, into the deep mud at a 60 degree angle. After Jim set the pole deep enough, he secured it to the stern, with a length of rope. Then our guide finallly turned to make a leisuely response to my comment.

“Damned if I care how deep the bay-mud is, as long as this ##@$###’ pole, holds us steady on the edge of my 'secret fishin' hole' where we’ll ketch fish.”

It did. And at each cast, our hooks, baited with fresh grass shrimp, attracted ravenous fish which gobbled our baits. Both Bob and I netted us each several nice-size fish. We pulled at least ten keeper-size Red Fish, Speckled Trout or Snapper out of that spot (but we put only one each in the ice chest). Oh…you ask, “Where is that hole?” Sorry, I was sworn to secrecy.


FLORIDA'S LONG AND INTERESTING GEOLOGICAL HISTORY
Geologically, Florida (and its extreme southern tip, Florida Bay) is a most recent addition to the North American continent. Florida became a part of North America only late in the continent’s history, during the early Mesozoic Era, about 200 million years ago (mya), when dinosaurs roamed the earth. That was a time when all the earth’s continental slabs had been swept together into one great supercontinent known as “Pangaea.” The upper surface layer of the earth, or “crust” is able to slip around on the deeper and heavier mantle surface, as you might shift and slide the pieces of a Rubic’s Cube. This process of coalescence and spreading of continental slabs has occurred several times in the past over the earth’s long 4.5 billion year history. The cyclical process includes a phase in which the lighter continental slabs slide over the surface to combine into one large world continent, forming mountain chains at the line of collision, then, after a period of quiescence, they fracture and separate apart again. The continents, composed of lighter, low-density rocks (called sial) were formed by the chemical and physical alteration of the primordial heavy, dark-colored basalt rock from the earth’s mantle. Sial is formed from mantle rock when it is extruded onto the surface of the earth where it interacts with the atmosphere and hydrosphere to produce a relatively lighter and light-colored frothy rock we know as sialic rock or granite. The process of creating supercontinents and taking them apart again has been going on for nearly as long as the earth has been around. Geologists have documented several past sequences. But in the most recent phase, (in what is known as the Mesozoic Era, or Age of Dinosaurs occurring from 250 mya to 65 mya), North America, Africa, Eurasia, Australia and Antarctica were sutured together (if you can imagine that) along a line which ran down the east coast of North America. This great suture-line was puckered up along its length to form the ancient Appalachian Mountain chain. To the east was the vast continent of Africa, and to the west that of North America. The process of continent collision had begun hundreds of millions of years earlier in the Paleozoic Era (about 460 mya) with the process being completed to form Pangaea, about 250 mya.

The great mountain chain running from Georgia to Maine had been undergoing erosion for some time when our Florida story begins, but it even then it resembled more the present-day Himalayas than our Appalachians of today.

Our story of Florida begins after the supercontinent of Pangaea had been formed and was in place for about 20 million years (early in the Mesozoic Era (Dinosaur Age) about 180 million years ago). At that time (180mya), the southern end of Pangaea just east of where the Appalachian Mountains ended began to fray apart at a “rift” zone between what would be today the North American and African continents. The source of the rifting or spreading was both slow persistent currents in the mantle and the intrusion of thin layers of molten rock into the overlying crust. Molten rock from the earth’s mantle, heated by nuclear fission, squeezed and melted its way upward through elongate cracks and fractures in the brittle, upper-crust. Thin slivers of molten mantle-rock (basalt) penetrated the crust and cooled. The process continued at a steady rate, causing the crust to bulge upward slightly and press the two sides of the rift apart. The combined effects actually push and spread continents apart, in this case driving the giant slabs of North America and Africa apart from each other. The area formed by the fracture zone, known as a “rift valley” (like the one in east Africa today), comprised of heavy rock sagged and was soon filled with sea-water as spreading continued. This newly created arm of the sea, between North America and Africa was, of course, the primordial Atlantic Ocean and the spreading center (pushing the continents apart at the rate at which human finger nails grow) would create a low, elongate bulge on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean about half-way between Africa and North America eventually known as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.

But back to Florida’s history! As North America spread away from Africa, an accessory rift in this location isolated a large rectangular chunk of the African continent, and left it stranded near the southern end of present-day Georgia as Africa slid away. That piece of African basement-rock which remained behind would eventually become what geologists call the ‘Florida Platform’ or the base upon which other more modern sediments accumulated to form what we know as the State of Florida.

The Florida Platform has a distinct pattern of two different rock types, basalt rock in the northern end, granite in the center, and basalt in the southern end. Geologists working in western Africa can point today to the place where these rocks were rifted away from that continent, so very long ago. A closer look at the Platform reveals a central portion which is comprised of lighter rock and which tended to be buoyed-upward while the northern end and southern ends are of heavier rock which sagged downward. This pattern of basement rock orientation continued to control geological processes on the peninsula as we will see below.

Initially, the whole of the primordial Florida peninsula was buoyant enough to rise up above sea level. A shallow ocean, much like what we see in present day Florida Bay covered the entire peninsula of those days, with perhaps small portions of the central corridor rising up as low islands. At this time, due to the sag in the northern end of the peninsula (where the rocks were denser), a “trough” formed which permitted the ancient Gulf Stream to meander its way across the northern end of early Florida near where present-day Jacksonville is now situated. Though erosion was actively wearing down the steep Appalachian mountains just north of Florida and producing copious clastic (continental or sialic) sediments two features, the Florida Trough, and the Gulf Stream current prevented the accumulation of these from reaching peninsula Florida. As it is today in Florida Bay the sources of water bring little or no clastic sediment and the water remains clear. Only marine derived lime sediment from the mechanical break-down of marine shell is found in Florida Bay. That is very much what all of peninsula Florida looked like in those days.

Thus, for millions of years the bottom of the shallow seas which washed over Florida accumulated only marine-derived sediments such as coral-and-shell-derived-lime-mud. Continental clastic (i.e. mud and sand ) sediments such as quartz or sialic-mineral sands were excluded. The early seas would have looked much like modern day Florida Bay where the natural processes of growth and decay of corals, shell-fish, crustaceans and tiny marine organisms which live in the warm tropical and clear waters creates the sediments, as they do today in Grand Bahamas Banks.

North of Florida on the mainland, near the end of the Mesozoic Era, parts of the Appalachian chain were uplifted and a new flood of continental sediments (made up of weathered and broken siliceous rocks such as granite) were carried down from Georgia’s highlands and eventually filled in the Gulf Trough.

By about 45 mya in the early Cenozoic, the Gulf Stream was directed further south around this build-up of continental sand and clay sediment on the Florida Platform. More clastic deposits such as land-derived silt, clay and sand poured down onto the peninsula, washing south to create the uplands and flatlands of northern and north-central Florida. More of these materials were found along the west and east coasts than in the interior, as a consequence a shallow topographic trough developed in this central region. During this time, the southern end of the peninsula, from Lake Okeechobee south, remained isolated from these events and the southern region continued to be partially inundated by shallow seas.

In the most recent periods of geologic history, the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs, this fragile area experienced several periods when sea levels receded and the land was exposed, and other times when high stands of the sea washed in and covered it again. During the latter periods more deposits of lime-mud accumulated, building up thick deposits of limestone as the basement rock for most of southern Florida. In the former times when the limestone basement was exposed to aerial erosion the limestone became weakened and eroded, exposed joints in rock widened and let mildly acid rain water and groundwater seep downward. In some places, solution cavities and limestone caverns formed beneath the surface. Over time the solution cavities enlarged and the caverns collapsed to create an uneven and checkered surface called karst topography.


LAKE OKEECHOBEE AND FLORIDA BAY
Lake Okeechobee (with an area of more than 700 square miles, an average depth of nine feet deep, and with a capacity of more than a trillion gallons of fresh water) sits at the northern end of a long shallow topographic depression which occupies the central portion of the southern half of the Florida peninsula and dips toward the south. The trough formed when the clay which underlies the center of the peninsula compacted more than the sand and limestone deposits found along both coasts. The region was once dry land, but with increased rainfall and rising ground water tables it became a marshy, low-lying zone where from about 6000 to 4000 years ago peat bogs developed. With increasing rainfall and rising water levels the bogs flooded, forming a shallow lake. As result of the high stand of the water table much of the vegetation in the central area of the lake died. The southward flow of surface water tended to carry decayed materials and nutrients in that direction where it accumulated in drifts along the south shore of the lake. In these regions, the rate of growth of the peat-forming vegetation along the south bank was enhanced and the rate of peat formation increased. Eventually, peat deposits built up, rising to a level of about 13 feet, a height sufficient to dam the water flow and create a permanent, but shallow lake behind it. Seasonally, during the spring and fall, water levels in the lake would reach levels high enough to rise up and top the dam. These overflow waters flow south into the Everglades where it slowly drifts further south and eventually seeps into Florida Bay. This southward seepage was critical for the health of the freshwater Everglades (The River of Grass) and as well for the vegetation and creatures of the estuarine lagoons of Biscayne Bay and Florida Bay, many of which (such as Turtle Grass and Mangrove ) are dependent upon a modulated level of salinity to survive and reproduce. Evaporation of the sea water in the shallow Florida Bay during the summer months and during drought periods sometimes causes salinity to rise to more than twice (or in some cases three times) the concentration of sea water. Those levels can kill or stunt the growth of some plant species were it not for the steady flow of fresh water from the Everglades.
Finally, in the last fifty (50) million years, the earth cooled and ice built up in northern regions forming continental glaciers on North America (where their farthest extent south on the east coast was at Long Island, New York) and elsewhere in the world, as a result causing world-wide sea levels to fall. Sea level fell so low (nearly 300 feet) causing nearly the entire Florida Platform at one time to be exposed to the air, becoming over three hundred (300) miles wide at the latitude of Lake Okeechobee rather than the present day 135 miles wide. Then, slowly, as the glaciers melted and retreated, about 10-15,000 years ago in the north, they added meltwaters back into the sea (and the climate warmed) causing sea-level to rise slowly at a rate of about (since 1932, sea levels have been rising at a rate of 1 foot (0.30 m) per 100 years) ----cm per year.

CORAL REEFS AND THE HISTORY OF THE KEYS
During the last 10,000 years coral reefs formed along the southern end of peninsula on the steep edge of the original basement rock one the edge of the Florida Platform. Corals can live and thrive only in clear, warm, agitated seawater, and only within 200 feet of the surface. They are almost exclusively found in tropical or near tropical waters. The southern end of Florida, where the basement rocks dropped off into abyssal depths, and the Gulf Stream carries silt-free, warm, sea water–is a place where corals can thrive. Here along the southern edge of the peninsula, grew underwater “forests” of brain coral, fan coral, shelf coral, and staghorn corals. In the process of growing and expanding, the corals produced vast quantities of coral-rock which filled in the spaces around the living corals and create environments for other creatures, such as mollusks, crustaceans, bryozoans, foraminifera, and some forms of algae all of which remove calcium from sea water and create calcium carbonate.

As sea levels rose, the corals grew upward to keep within the well-lit or photic zone (@ upper two hundred feet (sixty meters) of the surface where there was sufficient sunlight for the living algae which live symbiotically within the body of the coral polyps and carry on photosynthesis. These algae, which like plants, come in many different colors, are termed zooxanthelle (they are a form of “green” algae which live within the coral polyps bodies in a symbiotic relationship and which produce the majority (90%) of energy the coral polyps need to thrive.)

In time, coral reefs along Florida’s south coast developed and expanded into an elongate arc of approximately two-hundred miles long. The arc of coral reefs begin in the east, off shore from Virginia Key near Miami, and extend south and west all the way to the Dry Tortugas some 230 miles distant to the west. Protected from wave action and erosion by the reef line, is a quiet area of sea water where there is little of no sediment from land and where calcium carbonate-debris produced by corals, bryozans, foraminifera, mollusks, crustaceans and other sea life accumulates as a lime-mud sediment. The shallow lagoons we know as Biscayne Bay and Florida Bay as well as the sandy banks which make up the lower keys are composed of this waste by-product of coral growth as well as other animals and some plants which remove carbon-dioxide from the water and combine it with calcium ions in sea water to produce calcium carbonate (though not in that order). Thus corals and other marine organisms help to remove and sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. In that way they help to cleanse the atmosphere of excess carbon dioxide. They are indeed “green” organisms. The lime-mud produced by corals and other animals carpets the sea-floor, and like other sediments is carried by currents to settle in areas of quiet water. The lagoon environment landward of the Florida Keys was and remains such an environment--where carbonate mud accumulates. In some places the fine grained deposits are reworked by currents and waves to form small oval particles (1-2 mm in diameter) called “ooids” (“oo oids”) when this material becomes compacted it forms what is known as oolitic limestone. The lower Keys and Key West are composed of this form of limestone.

FLORIDA BAY AS A LAGOON SYSTEM
The Florida Bay lagoon is a shallow warm-water tropical, sea. The lagoons are carpeted in a thick carbonate mud upon which the Turtle Grass and Manatee Grass grow. It is noteworthy that these plants are not “seaweeds” or “real grass”, but actual flowering plants which only remotely resemble seaweed. They have true flowers and produce fruits as well. The “grasses” of the lagoons are an integral element of the overall ecology of the Bay.

The lime-mud and sand sediment which carpets Biscayne and Florida Bays is derived from fragments of living corals, algae, sea grasses, shellfish-- such as oysters and clams, and mostly the vast numbers of minute animals with calcareous shells which live on the sea grasses and algae and within the sediments of this environment.

Florida Bay, Biscayne Bay, parts of the western keys and the Marquesea Islands and the Dry Tortugas are all part of the lagoon-system protected from the sea by the arc of reefs we know as the Florida Keys.


All about corals at” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_reef

As we cast our lines into the quiet waters near Carl Ross Key and watched the rod tips for that tell tale bobbing action of a feeding fish, I asked, Jim what’s it like on that island?”
“It’s all jest lime mud or stuff the geologists call “ooliths”. He pulled down the bandana he used to protect his face from the sun to mouth out the word precisely.
“Yeah oo..oo..liths,” he said.

“The basement of the islands of the upper Keys are made up of stony corals and stuff that breaks off the corals and gets crushed up by fish like parrot fish which actually eat coral,” said Jim.
We often think of only the hard skeleton when we hear the word “coral”, however, the actual hard, stony coral is, in life, covered by a thin film of living matter from which, in a regular pattern, spring tiny sac-like animals with a ring of tentacles around their mouth and known as “colonial coelenterates”. The word coelenterate, signifies an animal which has a “coelenteron” or an empty sac which communicates with the outside sea water through a manubrium or mouthlike structure. Some of the “sac-bearing animals” form colonies which secrete calcium carbonate to support their soft bodies. Each individual looks like a tiny sea anemone, another coelenterate. Like that creature, it has tentacles arranged around a central mouth and a coelenteron (a sac-like structure). The tentacles are armed with stinging cells (scientists call them “cnidoblasts”) which are designed to immobilize and entangle small floating prey-animals. Once immobilized, the tentacles move the prey to the manubrium (mouth) and then into the coelenteron where digestion takes place. Unlike anemones, corals can lay down a solid film of sturdy calcium carbonate just below its base to anchor it and to help support their soft bodies. The colony of corals can produce calcite forms of great variety which can grow to great size as each season a new layer of calcite is added on top of the old layer. Like plants, corals tend to grow toward the light. So, if they live on a slowly subsiding sea-bottom they can maintain their preferred location, close to the surface, by adding new growth at a rate that keeps up with the subsidence. However, when sea levels fall, and they are exposed to the air, they die and their calcite skeletons break up and become part of the sea sediment.

As a consequence of their great potential for exuberant growth, corals and the complexes they form called “reefs” are sometimes referred to as “the marine equivalent of the tropical forest” or the tropical forests of the oceans. The individual animals (of the colony) or these are referred to as “polyps”, each have colorful zooxanthelle (single-celled “green” plants) which live symbiotically within the animals’s clear tissues, and as a result live corals are often very brightly colored. The chlorophyll in these cells may have various colors. Corals thus exhibit symbiosis-- a mutually beneficial relationship between two different species. The zooxanthelle living within the polyp’s tissues use sunlight to photosynthesize carbon dioxide and water into simple sugars which are then used by the coral animals (and the zooxanthelle) as a major part of their nutrient supply. Like all green plants the zooxanthelle produce oxygen which is used by the coral polyps. While the benefit to the zooxanthelle is that they have a safe place to live (inside of the coral polyp) where they are well-supplied with carbon dioxide resulting from the metabolism of the coral animal, and, as well, have free access to water and sunlight.

It is axiomatic that corals occur in warm, clear, low-nutrient, tropical waters, typically described as “blue water”. Blue water is encountered far off-shore (or in enclosed seas like the Mediterranean which is surrounded largely by dry or desert lands) or places far away from land where sediment is scarce(terrestrial environments shed sediment via rivers and streams). These areas also are source of minerals such as phosphates, and nitrates, plant nutrients, which cause blooms of algae. The deep blue color of “blue water” is a sign of low nutrient load and low suspended (sediment)matter. The blue color is generally a good indicator of a water column of low fertility. The blue itself is the result of the fact that the sun’s rays are able to penetrate to depth where the red and yellow wavelengths are absorbed and reflect back only the short-wave blue and violet part of the spectrum which are of a wave length which interact (or scatter) with the water molecules themselves, scattering them and sending those wavelengths back into our eyes. The blue color indicates that light is not coming in contact with suspended matter—such as sediment and plankton--indicating very low nutrient load. Since corals can produce their own food, they can survive in these low-nutrient environments. But since corals can live only in the photic (well-lighted) zone, they die when they are too deep (over 200 feet) where sunlight can-not penetrate, or also where they are too cold, preferring water around 20-27 degrees C (i.e., close to room temperature), or in poorly oxygenated or murky sediment-laden water—or water that is too acid.

When corals are stressed by one or more of these conditions they might void their zooxanthelle (or digest them) and thus turn colorless. “Bleached corals” are corals that are being environmentally stressed. Thus, it is easy to understand why corals are threatened worldwide. Along the well-visited Florida Keys where 82,000 inhabitants make their homes (and an equal or greater number of tourists make visits each year) there are obvious major disturbances. These are caused by the physical presence of motor boats, by the dumping of fuels, by disposal of sewage and human wastes rich in nitrogen and phosphorous. The latter substances can cause algae blooms, as well as the alteration of the acid-base level or pH of sea-water, which is normally well-buffered, but in many places now shows signs of increasing acidification as a result of burning fossil fuels—you know-- global warming.

Jim Wilcox, our well-informed guide, pointed out that though corals inhabit only less than one-tenth of one-percent of the earth’s ocean surface…they provide a home to twenty-five percent of the oceans marine species. Jim ticked off a list of fish, mollusks, worms, crustaceans, echinoderms, tunicates that live in or around coral reefs.

“That’s what a ‘paradox’ is,” said Jim, as he focused his eyes, partly obscured by his thin face mask (a protection against the sun) on the gentle but regular bobbing of the last ferrule on the tip of the heavy rod, baited with a big chunk of a Ladyfish.

“What’s that?” asked Bob, rising from a bit of mid-day sun-induced lethargy.

“Probably a crab or a small catfish nibblin’ on that bait,” said Jim.

“No, I mean what’s the ‘paradox’?” said Bob.

“Oh, the paradox is that these coral critters thrive so well as to produce all this here mud in the Bay, by livin’ only in waters that are so poor in nutrients. They are like them nitrogen-fixing plants—the legumes-- of the land-plant world--they also can produce their own food—ya know, by them nodules on their roots,” he added, stopping to reel in a bit of slack on the heavy rod. Then he turned and faced Bob “and that’s how they create such a rich environment for all these other critters…..” But at that point Jim suddenly stopped speaking, as he turned to the stern of the skiff where the rod tip bounced hard in its holder and the braided 100 lb test whirred out over the restraint of a tight star-drag…”and even these big-mouth Tarpon out here”, grunted Jim, as he pulled the rod from its holder and jabbed at the blue sky with a vicious hook-setting strike.

The heavy rod tip, bent into a sharp curve.

Jim yelled excitedly. “He’s on!”

He violently pumped in a few yards of line as the rod bent into a bow-shape, it's tip bending down over the gunwhale to dance just above the water.

“He’s a big’un,” he said, his arms straining as he as he moved aft to pass the tense rod over to Bob.

“What’s on?"Bob and I yelled in unison.

“Dunno, but it's a big unnnnnnnn!" grunted Jim through clenoched teeth, as the rod jerked downward sharply, twisting our fish guide around and pulling him toward the gunwale.

Then--- "Auuuuu…shit!” cursed Jim' as the line suddenly went slack.

“Lost im,” said Jim, disconsolately, as he reeled the loose wavy line in over the boat side.

Then he turned optimistic again, continuing."It would be a horrible mistake if we stupidly let something bad happen to these coral critters,” opined Jim as he rummaged in his well stocked orderly fishing box to replace the lost hook and leader.



A LIST OF CRITTERS I OBSERVED ON THE TRIP

INVERTEBRATES

PORIFERA
Unidentified sponges

INSECTS
Great Southern White Butterfly (Ascia monuste). Food: Sea Rocket and Saltwort

CRUSTACEANS
Horseshoe crab
Blue Crab


FISH
Gafftopsail Catfish
Great Barracuda or “cuda”
Ladyfish
Mangrove Snapper
Mullet
Pinfish
Red Drum
Smalltooth Sawfish (a rare and threatened species) (Pristis pectinata) adults are 9-13’
long, but we saw several three-foot babies in the shallows)
Speckeled Trout
Southern Stingray
Spotfin or Mojarra
Stripped Mullet
Tarpon or “poon”

REPTILES
Atlantic Ridley Turtle
Reef Gecko
American crocodile (Jim spotted a muddy area on a small key he said looked like a “croc mud wallow”. So not seen but reputed to be in the area)


MAMMALS
Bottlenosed Dolphin

BIRDS
Bald Eagle
Black Vulture
Brown Pelican
Common Tern
Caspian Tern
Cormorant-very common..some seen resting on stakes above turtle grass replenishment zones.
Double Crested Cormorant
Frigate Bird
Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias)—On Carl Ross Island
Great White Egret—(Ardea albus) widespread
Great White Heron
Laughing gull
Magnificent Frigate bird
Osprey (Pandion haliaetus) commonly seen feeding on channel stakes out in Florida Bay
Ring necked Dove
Ringbilled Gull
Roseate Spoonbill—near Car Ross Island Florida Bay
Roseate Tern ?—common on channel marker stakes where they rest and feed
Royal Tern
Showy Egret (Egretta thula) widespread



Distance Note:

From Bud and Mary’s Marina on Matacumba.Key it is thirty miles to the Gulf of Mexico


PLANTS

Grasses

Turtle Grass http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/southflorida/seagrass/profiles.html

Manatee Grass http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/southflorida/seagrass/profiles.html

Turtle grass (Thalassia testudinum) is not a sea weed---or a grass. It is a flowering plant which has flowers which produce light green to pink blooms underwater and are pollinated under water. The fruit form and drift away to form new plants. Turtle grass has a horizontal rhizome buried as much as ten inches under the marine mud on which it lives. The plant prefers water of high salinity and protected from wave action. The flat elongate leaves with rounded tips arise from the rhizome and can be as long as 10-12 inches long. The plants expand into new areas by growth of the rhizome at its terminal end. If these are cut they do not re-grow. Cutting rhizomes by mechanical means—such as a boat propeller- can kill the plant and cause vacuae in the beds which may not quickly fill in. Skimming over the surface the “flats” in Jim Wilcox’s skiff at forty-knots we could often clearly see bottom—and the elongate propeller “scars” in the turtle-grass beds where as Jim noted..”some ‘boat cowboys’ ” had “a problem” keeping to the channel at low tide. These scars were quite common on the bay bottom..”too common” remarked Jim.

Many fish feed among the turtle grass beds. Some use the beds to hide from predators, seek shade or shelter or to stalk prey, while many others are fish-herbivores which feed on the grass itself. While fishing for Speckled Trout, Jim threaded a white, rubber-shrimp on a 2-0 lead-head lure for each of his two “sports”. He directed us to cast out and bump the lure back along the bottom. Invariably we would get a sharp strike on the first or second pump of the rod tip. Then we would have a sharp battle with the resistant trout, ladyfish, pinfish or drum to get it to the boat side and into the ice box or bait well on the stern of the boat. On several occasions, missing these first strikes and retrieving the lure closer to the boat, I could watch it clearly through the crystal clear and shallow water as it bounced among the thick turtle grass and patches of dead weed that Capt. Jim called “underwater tumble weed”. On several occasions I watched as a trout or a drum would lurch out of a clump of turtle grass to pounce on the lure.

Manatee Grass is very similar. It grows along the bottom attached to long rhizomes, but the Manatee grass favors slightly deeper water. On our way back to Bud and Mary’s one day, Jim Wilcox stopped the skiff over a deep hole where Manatee grass grew profusely. The leaves on this plant, which were aligned by a strong current, are longer and cylindrical rather than flat as they are in turtle grass. Jim indicated that the rhizomes are not buried as deep in the mud as are those of the former species. So they are more likely cut and damaged by boat properllers. “Maybe that’s why they are only found in these deep holes” suggested Jim. Jim indicated the name “manatee grass” is result of the fact that this species is a preferred food of manatees. But we saw none feeding on it. Though Jim says he is on the lookout for them since they are often found in the Bay but not in the flats. Among the Manatee grass we did find circular open patches bare or grass which were occupied by large “breadloaf” sponges. Indeed to me they did look like large loaves of those artisanal Italian round loaves—I love so much.


LANDING ON CARL ROSS KEY

Carl Ross Key is located in the northwestern end of Florida Bay, bounding the Gulf of Mexico. It is about 35 miles northwest of Upper Matecumba Key and about an hour’s trip by speeding skiff from the village of Islamorada (Spanish: “Purple Island”). Jim Wilcox our guide landed the skiff there after we successfully fished the near-by channel on a flooding tide. My fishing buddy Bob R. caught a big barracuda in the channel and landed it, while later on, I hooked in to a 'huge' yellow-tipped shark. The shark pulled like a locomotive and bent the stiff, gamefish-pole, threaded with braided, 100 lb test line into an unsustainable “c” curve. The rig was set for tarpon (which have no real teeth) so there was only a two foot monofilament leader attached to a big 2”0” hook. I had the shark on for a good arm-wrenching twenty minutes as it pulled us and the skiff along, while Jim, using the long boat pole, tried to herd the critter, by poling the boat toward shallow water to where we might get a look at it. Finally, it swam into a dead-end channel, and to get out it had to double back past the boat…as I reeled in furiously to take up slack we did get to see the dorsal fin and the long angled-up tail as it swam between the boat and the bank. But the change in direction must have scraped the mono over those sharp triangular teeth and after one more powerful run--the leader parted and the fish was gone.

“Fare thee well Mr. Shark” I called after it, as Jim swore in anger over my shoulder.

“Should’a had a wire-leader on that’un in this channel!”

At this point, we were close to Carl Ross Key and Jim suggested we land there for a bit of exploring. On the way in we cut the engine and drifted over shallows, where we caught a few Mangrove Snappers by casting our lead-head jigs with a white rubber shrimp threaded on to the hook. Jim showed us how to thread the shrimp on so the tail fanned out. “Let’s see that one ‘Dr. Rock’,” he said, which was the name he coined for me…there being two “Bobs” in the skiff that day. “Don’t thread it on to make a “c” shape out of the shrimp..leave that hook tip bare…they’ll catch themselves..those hungry little beggars!”

As Jim slowly poled us up to a sandy landing spot on the key, Bob and I caught five or six nice-size snappers and dumped two of the biggest into the ice-chest to keep for our fish supper. We stowed the poles and stepped off onto Carl Ross Key.

“A few years back…this here little key and that one out there was joined up into one long island”, said Jim, but when Hurricane Emily came through here out of the Gulf it beat the hell out of this key--swept the mangroves clear off and made two keys out of one. This here small key is the remnant of that storm,” said Jim, stepping down into the clear water and pulling the skiff’s bow ashore, onto a cream-colored fine sandy mud. As Jim tied the bow to a thick mangrove branch, Bob and I looked at each other and about sixty years each drifted away as we stepped ashore feeling like little kids living out the fantasy of setting foot on a treasure or desert island. It was my first landing on a real “tropical island.” I was fascinated. Jim, Bob and I took a slow walking tour around the small island in bright hot sunlight. The key was only about two acres in extent, but a world away from our everyday experiences.

I observed that the Black Mangrove formed a ring of growth around the edge of the island. As I strolled around I observed that the sand as I noted above. was all of marine origin, a calcareous deposits of sand and mud. Any pebble-sized materials were shell or shell fragments. The sand that formed the key seemed to have been washed up from the surrounding bay. I envisioned huge waves carrying Bay sediment up through the mangroves and over-washing the island. I was glad I was not there at that time. Jim told of several big mangrove trees which were washed off of Carl Ross Key and ended up in Rabbit Basin far to the east. There the trees sat in deep water with its upper branches just breaking the surface. (Later that day, we fished at those very same Carl Ross Key trees. Each tree acted as a barrier to the currents which swept around them, creating a deep hole or depression in the bay mud. The depression was a great attraction to the local fish and each cast, brought a vicious strike by a big snapper, speckled trout, or drum and we hauled in each one the end of the line.)

Back on Carl Ross Key, I made notes on some of the major plants which had colonized the island. Aside from the Black Mangrove (which was in bloom on the day of the visit May 17, 2011) I observed large areas colonized by the common backyard plant known as portulacca It was common in dry hot and exposed areas. While Day Flower, Commelina virginica (or a related species) appeared to occupy areas more protected from the hot sun. In the center of the key, where the substrate was piled a few feet above sea level were lively clumps of dark green Indian Fig (Opuntia humifosa ?) and scattered among them were a few yucca plants.

PLANTS OBSERVED ON CARL ROSS KEY (May 2011)

Black Mangrove
Red Mangrove
White Mangrove
The Day Flower (Commelina virginica) commonly known as the Virginia day-flower, is a perennial herbaceous plant in the dayflower family. It is native to the mideastern and southeastern United States, where it is typical of wet soils. While most members of the genus have thin, fibrous roots, the Virginia dayflower is relatively unique for its genus in having a perennial rhizome. This rhizome may be able to be uprooted and washed along with storm waves. That may be a way in which this plant may have reached the isolated island.

Yucca species possibly (Yucca flaccida) is native to Florida and is found growing on coastal sands, waste places, beach sands, and similar places in the state. Either its seeds or roots could have been carried to the island by waves or ocean or storm currents.

Indian Fig (Opuntia humifusa?) The Indian Fig is found in dry places from New England to Florida. Its fruit is edible and its “pads” can produce a new plant. It is common onnbeach environments in the south of Florida.

Portulaca or Purslane (Portulaca grandiflora?) which is a common garden plant in south Florida and since its succulent leaves and stems can float it is a good candidate to have arrived by storm waves or floating on a raft of weed stems. It is an edible plant and could have served some cast-away (not