Wednesday, January 24, 2018

FBI COLLUSION—-BLAME THE ELECTION POLLS


Newest revelations indicate that elements of the the government itself—the FBI, CIA, Obama Administration, Clinton sympathizers and the Clinton Global Initiative  colluded in an attempt to help Hillary Clinton into he White House and hinder the Trump candidacy.  After the election, during the transition, this effort intensified when investigations into “collusion with the Russians” to affect the election morphed into the Mueller special counsel investigation.  FISA court spying episodes on Trump and his team and the firing and indictments of some Trump associates characterized this period of harassment of the new administration.  We now know, as a result of Congressinal investigations, that there is no evidence of “collusion with Russians” to affect the election by the Trump, but a great deal of evidence (Strzok-Paige-McCabe-Comey-etc etc etc) collusion within the government to affect the elction, and continuing illegal and unconstitutional efforts  to develop evidence to use in a Trump impeachment.  The effort continues as I write this.

But how did it occur?

It all had to do with the erroneous election polls.  All the polls had Mr Trump losing in a massive landslide.  Most polls a week before the electi0on showed him with no more than a 30% chance of winning.  But they were all wrong.  Many people did not reveal to pollsters their actual voting preferences were.  The pollsters also have a difficulty predicting the results in the electoral college.  Trump won by electoral wins in 30 of the 50 states.  He came close to winning in the (meaningless) popular vote too,  He lost there  by only two or three million votes.  It was a far closer race than any of the polls indicated.    (Trump claimed, probably correctly, that many of those pro Clinton votes were cast by illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities.)


How and why did the organs of government turn on Trump?  Before the election elements within the deep state, the government, the democrat machine and the seat warmers in DC were all assured of a Clinton win.  If they were to put their thumbs on the scales of the election process...who would know? After the election with a Clinton Presidency...no one would investigate any mproprieties or illegalities (or treason).  All acts of collusion to “help” Clinton the “righteous” and deserving candidate would be met with a wink and a nod and perhaps a promotion to a better position or higher pay for the “collusion” perpetrator, his or her spouse or his or her child or sibling. (That’s how the nepotistic system works in DC)   The FBI anti Trump crowd (Strzok-Paige) were so certain of a Clinton win they stupidly and unconcernedly  conducted all of their potentially treasonous discussions on their office equipment...unafraid that it might recorded and exposed.

But on election night all these “perps” literally wet their pants when the election results were announced.  Trump won!  These deep state, activist-colluders were now in dire jeopardy.  They could expect no pat on the back or promotion for their perfidy...but their acts of interference in an election could be exposed as illegal—or worse. They could lose their jobs, their spouses (working in some other cushy govement job) would be tarred as well,  and they might have to actually remove  their kids from the private academy into the public schools.

So what did they do during the transition?  To protect themselves from eventual exposure as anti-Trump activist, they intensified their effort to undermine the new President.  Among other things they used the phony Steele Dossier, to gin up FISA court spying on the new administaripon.  They colluded to protect themselves and their jobs.  At this point they were engaged in actual illegality as they colluded with others in the government in an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of a legitimately elected President.

That’s how it happened.  A story of self serving acts, greed and corruption in the DC swamp—much of it the result of inaccurate and misleading poll numbers.

No comments: