DEM HYPOCRICY: FEEDING FRENZY ON RUSSIAN ELECTION , IGNORE OBAMA "SPYING"

HYPOCRISY OF DEMS..IGNORE POLITICAL "SPYING" WHILE THEY DECRY NO-EVIDENCE "RUSSIAN MEDDLING' IN ELECTION.



WDEMS IGNORING SERIOUS THEATS TO OUR PRIVACY, 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND THE POLITICIZATION OF INTELLIGENCE GATHERING BY THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

THE MASSIVE SPY AGENCIES WE HAVE SPAWNED SINCE 9-11 DO NOT COOPERATE WITH TRUMP. FEARFUL OF REVEALING THEIR WIDE-RANGING ABILITY TO SPY ON OUR OWN CITIZENS.

AND MEDIA AND DEEP STATE COLLUDE TO DELEGITIMIZE OUR NEW PRESIDENT

There seems to be two "Washingtons" out there along the Maryland and Virginia border. Each one has its own reality. The rest of the nation, far removed from the "495 Ring Road", looks on with trepidation and disbelief, fearful of where all this self-destructive behavior is going to take us.

Each of these "Washingtons" has its own reality tale. Out here in the hinterlands, information seeps around our ankles rather than drowns us so perhaps we have a better sense of what's actually going on. But it is not reassuring or pretty.

One Washington is hyperbolically, insanely, hysterically obsessed with the Russians and the supposed influence a nation (with less than half of our population, only a fraction of our GDP and which spends one-tenth of our military/defense budget) on our 2016 election. The Democrats have taken to this "tale" like a cult religion. They and the media outlets which support them like paid partners find Trump-team "collusion with the Russians" around every corner and in every corridor.

Out here in the hinterlands we see DC more clearly. First, for most of us who have no political axe to grind, we find no evidence the Russians used untoward influence on our ELECTION OR ELECTION PROCESS. During the recent national campaign, they, like many other nations around the world, may have favored one candidate over the other. (President Obama openly approved not Mr. Netanyahu, but his opponent in the recent Israeli elections, even going to the extent of (illegally?) providing funds to the opposition candidate.) Here at home in 2016, the Russians , via Wikileaks, MAY HAVE (but there is no proof) helped to expose some of the Democrat foibles--like passing off debate questions to their candidate-- and the perfidy, deceptions and weaknesses of the Democrat candidate. But Mrs. Clinton was a well known quantity long before the election and any Russian expose', if there was one, exercised no control or impact on any citizen's actual vote. The fact is that Clinton until the very end of the campaign was poised to win. Overconfident of this, she took for granted an element of her coalition which in the very end abandoned her for Donald Trump. There was no possible Russian involvement in the dramatic and last minute loss of those northern "blue wall" states which turned the election to Mr. Trump. All of this is well established. The Democrats and the left-leaning media's attempt to rewrite history and delegitimize the nation's election process is shameful. It is a dangerous political fiction woven out of shock, shame and disbelief associated with a massive electoral defeat and watershed loss of political power.

So that is one of Washington's tales. The other "tale" has more evidence to support it and is a clear and present danger to our future and our well-being if we ignore it.

President Trump made the now infamous claims that he was being "spied" on by the former President. (He should know-- if he was...). For making this claim he was viciously pilloried in the press, on TV and over the airwaves. .His account now seems to be true. Recently the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee Mr. Devin Nunes has revealed evidence that Mr. Trump and his transition team were "spied on" during the interregnum between the election and the inauguration. That is: Mr. Obama was using the US foreign intelligence system to conduct domestic surveillance of the Trump campaign. That is a serious breach of US laws and must be investigated, and the perpetrators punished.

According to Chairman Nunes the "spying" was accomplished "legally". This implies that Obama (or his surrogates) must have used our vast arsenal of foreign and domestic "listening networks" to scour up Trump associates' contacts and listen in to their conversations. The government "spooks" could then claim they were "targeting" foreigners but their actual targets were Mr. Trump and his team. This was accomplished without necessary FISA court warrants issued and would leave no "fingerprints" or trails. Now that is serious. First it is a violation of the Forth Amendment rights of those US citizens who were "surveilled" and it is an indictment of the Obama Administration which appears to have stooped to the corruption levels of ancient Rome or Byzantium in its zeal to undermine the incoming Trump Administration and overturn or smear the manifested will of the people as expressed in a legitimate election. In addition, the illegally scoured up information was widely dispersed (as per Mr. Obama's" last days" executive order) with the express intention of it being leaked to the press. That plan was completed in the case of the reputation assasination of Lt. General Mike Flynn.

If Mr. Obama and the Democrats are displeased with the election outcome they should look to their party procedures for vetting a candidate--perhaps a more electable candidate--or review of their political strategy of ignoring the working class voters. The. Again they can also patiently wait until 2020 for their next try. But efforts to undermine the 2016 election results bordersn ing on treason.

Finally--the so called "intelligence community" is in lockstep in their public denials of Mr. Trump's claim of illegal spying. Why are the government "spooks", the vast "intelligence" community unwilling or unable to tell the truth regarding this issue? Why do we get the distinct impression they are lying to us? The suspected reason: if they support Mr. Trump's account of "illegal surveillance" that opens Pandora's spy box. It exposes the intelligence agencies as being able (and willing) to gather in information world wide---including illegally gathered data on American citizens. No one's Forth Amendment rights are secure. We can all be spied on even the President elect. That is a very serious breach of trust and existing laws that they would not like to reveal. So we can not expect them to reveal that Mr. Trump was spied on,

The problem we face is that the Democrats are in a "Russian Feeding Frenzy" and are unable or unwilling to honestly investigate a serious breach of US laws by the past administration. Of the two "tales" of Washington DC in 2017...one Russian Meddling is pure political theater...the other an existential threat to our democracy. The only relationship to Russia we see in these two tales is that no democracy can survive a "police state surveillance system" like the one in Russia.