KANGAROO IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HURTS DEMOCRATS AND NATION

It is clear now after the most recent iterations of the fake House Impeachment Inquiry which has morphed from a simple cowpuncher lynching, to Judge Roy Bean’s West Pecos, Texas “saloon courthouse” and now has been “rectified” as  a kangaroo court one might experience as a captured  Hong Kong demonstrator transported to a Beijing China for trial. In the Democrat’s courthouse there is no right to the assumption of innocence, or clear statements of charges against the accused.  No right to cross examine witnesses. No prohibition of self-incrimination.  No right to introduce evidence which supports acquittal.  None of these are permitted in Mr. Schiff’s kangaroo court. Rep Schiff makes up the rules and acts as judge and jury.  He also is in charge of secret leaks to the press.  Perhaps things would at least appear more consistent with the nature of the investigation if the  proceedings were held  in Judge Roy Bean’s West Pecos saloon or the Forbidden City.

We can conclude, about this new “impeachment inquiry” that —as in previous attempts at a deep state-palace-coup—there is no “there” there’   

This “Ukraine-telephone-call-coup-attempt” is a trumped up a charge as consistent with justice as was the infamous Pol Pot trial in Cambodia in 1989 when the judge’s verdict was printed and distributed to the press long before the trial ended.  The Democrats should be ashamed of these antics.  They harm the Party and the nation. 

The crux of the matter is that the President made a request to the President of  a foreign government to investigate its own corruption. That is part of his job description.   It a stretch to claim as the  Democrat accusers do that they could know what the  President’s motives were.  So how can they conclude his motives and actions  were somehow an “illegal” (impeachable?) use of power?  Furthermore, it is almost impossible to prove what a person’s motives are—or were—ill or beneficent.  If that could be accomplished the actions of every Congressman or Congresswoman who accepts financial support from a donor (all of them do) —could be rightly  questioned.    Does the acceptance of cash by a politician from a donor with a case before the government affect the way the politician voted?  What was the member’s motives god or self serving?   Try to find someone in DC who will agree that a politician’s motives are always self serving. But the hypocrites are doing that to the President. 

No one in the Democrat camp was aroused by the Hillary-Bill Clinton pay for play scheme or the Joe—Hunter Biden quid pro quo—schemes.  These questionable acts are all reported by MSM with claims of: “no hint or proof of wrongdoing”.   So how can an honest person treat Mr. Trump differently and continue to claim legitimacy?     The Democrats are skating on very thin ice if they think that anything positive (for their election prospects)  can come of the kangaroo court proceedings they are conducting , other than the nation’s voters realization of Democrat perfidy and stupidity and abandonment by the independent block of voters.  Their sorry slate of “not ready for prime time” candidates representing every fringe element for 2020 does not improve their legitimacy, or electability prospects either.  There must be some electable Dems out there someplace.

Trump is slated for easy reelection in the face of these phony charges, kangaroo court tactics, debilitating Democrat Trump derangement, and fringe candidates who would not stand a chance in a general election. 

The voters recognize phony charges, wild eyed outsider candidates with outlandish impractical policies .  The impeachment ploy is a political smear tactic to weaken the President with fake charges prior to an election—it will not work his base holds firm.