NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION? YES iITS TRUE!!

After nearly two years of digging dirt, $35 million dollars of tax money spent, thousands of hours of secret testimony in several venues, and all conducted by a team of fifteen or more fervent  anti-Trump attorneys eager and over eager to succeed at taking down a President, Mr. Robert Mueller came up with nothing.  No charges.  No evidence to prosecute.  End of story.

Special prosecutor Mueller’s mandate was to find evidence of “collusion” between Russia and the Trump team during the 2016 election.  He found none.  Stating in his report: “that the prosecutors “could not find evidence to move forward with the crime of collusion” (i.e. no charges were warranted).  That was an easy discovery.  Mr. Mueller made that determination very early on in his almost two year study, yet he kept that key finding a secret.  Some suggest his motive  was to set a trap for the President—to goad the President and then provide the  opportunity to commit the crime of “obstruction of justice”.  That did not occur.  Mueller completed his investigation and wrote his report.   His efforts were unhindered and unobstructed by the President.  Some would conclude that since there was no crime—and the investigation went ahead unhindered, thus there was no obstruction. But Mr. Mueller had to feed the raging beasts in the Democrat camp and the media hollering for blood.


So Robert Mueller, having no collusison crime to tag onto the President—turned his efforts to his weaker obstruction case and spent more that half of his 400+-page-report documenting possible and potential acts of “obstruction” by the President.  Yet even here he could NOT make a determination that the crime of obstruction had been committed.   Mueller, now exposed as a fervent anti-Trump ally and buddy of Mr. Comey, and the special prosecutor who filled his team of investigators with notoriously biased attorneys like Mr. Peter Strzok and Ms Lisa Page to work for him could not make the determination that the President committed the crime of obstruction—otherwise he and his 15 fervent anti-Trump attorneys would have certainly stated as much.  They did not.

In his report and in especially his press conference wherein the nervous, shaky, and shifty-eyed Mueller emphasized that he could not obsolve the President of crime.  As if that red herring was a part of his mandate.  But that is NOT the job of a prosecutor.  His job was to find evidence of a crime—and report it—his job was prosecution not adjudication (judging of guilt or innocence) . See: Professsor Alan Dershowitz’s op ed which so clearly and cogently lays out this premise in his piece in “theHill.com” entitled: “Shame on Robert Mueller for exceeding his role” May 29, 2019.

In the end it is clear—no collusion and no obstruction—nothing of significance came of Mr. Mueller’s tainted efforts.  Mueller failed! He failed to find the evidence he and his co-conspirators were seeking to take down a sitting President.  Mueller will go down in history as another anti-Trump “establishment” denizen of the corrupt DC swamp attempting to use his powerful position to sway political outcomes and elections that the nation would be best clensed of.